arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2306.12043cs.CLcs.AI

自然语言对抗攻击中的样本可攻击性

Sample Attackability in Natural Language Adversarial Attacks

University of Cambridge(剑桥大学)

Vyas Raina, Mark Gales

AI总结:

本研究正式定义NLP攻击中的样本可攻击性/鲁棒性,实验表明深度学习检测器优于样本不确定性方法,但不同攻击方法间可攻击性共识低,影响检测方法可移植性。

摘要:

自然语言处理(NLP)中的对抗攻击研究在设计强大的攻击方法和防御手段方面已取得显著进展。然而,很少有工作试图识别哪些源样本最易受攻击或最鲁棒,即我们能否针对一个未见过的目标模型,确定哪些样本最容易受到对抗攻击。本研究正式扩展了NLP攻击中样本可攻击性/鲁棒性的定义。在两个流行的NLP数据集、四个最先进的模型和四种不同的NLP对抗攻击方法上进行的实验表明,样本不确定性不足以描述可攻击/鲁棒样本的特征,因此基于深度学习的检测器在识别未见过的目标模型的最可攻击和最鲁棒样本方面可以表现得更好。然而,进一步的分析发现,在不同的NLP攻击方法中,对于哪些样本被认为最可攻击/鲁棒几乎没有共识,这解释了可攻击性检测方法在不同攻击方法之间缺乏可移植性。

英文摘要:

Adversarial attack research in natural language processing (NLP) has made significant progress in designing powerful attack methods and defence approaches. However, few efforts have sought to identify which source samples are the most attackable or robust, i.e. can we determine for an unseen target model, which samples are the most vulnerable to an adversarial attack. This work formally extends the definition of sample attackability/robustness for NLP attacks. Experiments on two popular NLP datasets, four state of the art models and four different NLP adversarial attack methods, demonstrate that sample uncertainty is insufficient for describing characteristics of attackable/robust samples and hence a deep learning based detector can perform much better at identifying the most attackable and robust samples for an unseen target model. Nevertheless, further analysis finds that there is little agreement in which samples are considered the most attackable/robust across different NLP attack methods, explaining a lack of portability of attackability detection methods across attack methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑