arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.16865astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

探索增长指数 $γ_L$:来自不同 CMB 数据集组合与方法的见解

Exploring the Growth Index $γ_L$: Insights from Different CMB Dataset Combinations and Approaches

Enrico Specogna, Eleonora Di Valentino, Jackson Levi Said, Nhat-Minh Nguyen

AI总结:

本文利用MGCAMB和CAMB_GammaPrime_Growth两种方法,结合不同CMB数据集研究增长指数γ_L,发现Planck数据导致其偏离ΛCDM值0.55,而CMB透镜及ACT、SPT数据可恢复一致性,表明Planck的A_lens问题是偏离来源。

摘要:

在本研究中,我们考察了描述线性物质扰动增长的增长指数 $γ_L$,同时分析了不同的宇宙学数据集。我们比较了宇宙学求解器 CAMB 的两个不同补丁所实现的方法:MGCAMB 和 CAMB_GammaPrime_Growth。在分析中,我们发现当使用 Planck 数据集时,增长指数偏离了其预期的 $Λ$CDM 值 $0.55$,在 MGCAMB 情形和 CAMB_GammaPrime_Growth 情形中均如此,但偏离方向相反。这一偏离伴随着与导出宇宙学参数之间相关方向的变化。然而,纳入 CMB 透镜数据有助于在两种情形中使 $γ_L$ 与其 $Λ$CDM 值重新一致。相反,替代性的地面望远镜 ACT 和 SPT 始终给出与 $γ_L=0.55$ 一致的增长指数值。我们得出结论:Planck 数据集中存在的 A$_{\mathrm{lens}}$ 问题导致了所观测到的偏离,这凸显了额外数据集在解决这些差异方面的重要性。

英文摘要:

In this study we investigate the growth index $γ_L$, which characterizes the growth of linear matter perturbations, while analysing different cosmological datasets. We compare the approaches implemented by two different patches of the cosmological solver CAMB: MGCAMB and CAMB_GammaPrime_Growth. In our analysis we uncover a deviation of the growth index from its expected $Λ$CDM value of $0.55$ when utilizing the Planck dataset, both in the MGCAMB case and in the CAMB_GammaPrime_Growth case, but in opposite directions. This deviation is accompanied by a change in the direction of correlations with derived cosmological parameters. However, the incorporation of CMB lensing data helps reconcile $γ_L$ with its $Λ$CDM value in both cases. Conversely, the alternative ground-based telescopes ACT and SPT consistently yield growth index values in agreement with $γ_L=0.55$. We conclude that the presence of the A$_{\mathrm{lens}}$ problem in the Planck dataset contributes to the observed deviations, underscoring the importance of additional datasets in resolving these discrepancies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑