arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2305.04524cs.CV

场景文本识别中的图像-文本匹配引导词典

Scene Text Recognition with Image-Text Matching-guided Dictionary

East China Normal University(华东师范大学);Chongqing Institute of East China Normal University(华东师范大学重庆研究院);Indian Statistical Institute(印度统计研究所)

Jiajun Wei, Hongjian Zhan, Xiao Tu, Yue Lu, Umapada Pal

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于图像-文本匹配的词典语言模型,通过对比学习在特征空间中匹配图像与候选文本,纠正视觉预测偏差,在六个基准上达到93.8%准确率,并集成ABINet取得新最先进结果。

摘要:

在场景文本识别方法中,使用词典可以有效纠正视觉预测与真实标签之间的偏差。然而,词典对视觉特征的独立性可能导致对准确视觉预测的错误纠正。本文提出了一种利用场景图像-文本匹配(SITM)网络的新型词典语言模型,该模型避免了显式词典语言模型的缺点:1)对视觉特征的独立性;2)候选词中的噪声选择等。SITM网络通过使用图像-文本对比(ITC)学习,在推理阶段将图像与候选词中对应的文本进行匹配来实现这一目标。ITC广泛用于视觉-语言学习,以在特征空间中拉近正图像-文本对的距离。受ITC启发,SITM网络结合所有候选词的视觉特征和文本特征,以识别特征空间中距离最小的候选词。我们的词典方法在六个主流基准上取得了比普通方法(92.1%准确率)更好的结果(93.8%准确率)。此外,我们将我们的方法与ABINet集成,在多个基准上建立了新的最先进结果。

英文摘要:

Employing a dictionary can efficiently rectify the deviation between the visual prediction and the ground truth in scene text recognition methods. However, the independence of the dictionary on the visual features may lead to incorrect rectification of accurate visual predictions. In this paper, we propose a new dictionary language model leveraging the Scene Image-Text Matching(SITM) network, which avoids the drawbacks of the explicit dictionary language model: 1) the independence of the visual features; 2) noisy choice in candidates etc. The SITM network accomplishes this by using Image-Text Contrastive (ITC) Learning to match an image with its corresponding text among candidates in the inference stage. ITC is widely used in vision-language learning to pull the positive image-text pair closer in feature space. Inspired by ITC, the SITM network combines the visual features and the text features of all candidates to identify the candidate with the minimum distance in the feature space. Our lexicon method achieves better results(93.8\% accuracy) than the ordinary method results(92.1\% accuracy) on six mainstream benchmarks. Additionally, we integrate our method with ABINet and establish new state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑