arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.04413cs.HC

眼动数据中的信号与噪声:生物识别意义及跨频率的身份信息

Signal vs Noise in Eye-tracking Data: Biometric Implications and Identity Information Across Frequencies

Mehedi H. Raju, Lee Friedman, Dillon Lohr, Oleg Komogortsev

AI总结:

本研究探究眼动数据中75Hz上下的信号与噪声的生物识别意义,发现二者均含身份特异性信息,该结论在长短周期评估中均成立,为隐私保护提供依据。

摘要:

已有研究指出,眼动数据中75 Hz以下的频率代表被称为“信号”的主要眼动,而75 Hz以上的频率则被视为“噪声”。本研究考察了这种信号-噪声区分的生物识别意义及其隐私影响。个体的眼动存在重要的个体差异,这使得“信号”部分具备可靠的生物识别性能。尽管“噪声”记录中的眼动信息极少,但其中可能存在显著的个体差异。我们的研究结果证实,“信号”主要包含身份特异性信息,但“噪声”也含有出人意料的身份特异性数据。这一结论在短期(约20分钟)和长期(约1年)的生物识别评估中均成立。了解眼动频谱中身份数据的分布位置对于隐私保护至关重要。

英文摘要:

Prior research states that frequencies below 75 Hz in eye-tracking data represent the primary eye movement termed ``signal'' while those above 75 Hz are deemed ``noise''. This study examines the biometric significance of this signal-noise distinction and its privacy implications. There are important individual differences in a person's eye movement, which lead to reliable biometric performance in the ``signal'' part. Despite minimal eye-movement information in the ``noise'' recordings, there might be significant individual differences. Our results confirm the ``signal'' predominantly contains identity-specific information, yet the ``noise'' also possesses unexpected identity-specific data. This consistency holds for both short-(approx. 20 min) and long-term (approx. 1 year) biometric evaluations. Understanding the location of identity data within the eye movement spectrum is essential for privacy preservation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑