arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.04400cs.AIcs.CLq-bio.NC
收藏

大型语言模型是否表现出与人类相似的决策启发式?基于GPT-3.5的案例研究

Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5

San Francisco State University(旧金山州立大学)

Gaurav Suri, Lily R. Slater, Ali Ziaee, Morgan Nguyen

AI总结:

本研究通过四项实验发现GPT-3.5在决策中表现出与人类相似的锚定、代表性、可得性、框架和禀赋效应,提示语言可能在人类决策启发式形成中起作用。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)是一种人工智能系统,经过海量自然语言数据的训练,能够对书面或口头语言输入生成类似人类的响应。GPT-3.5是支持名为ChatGPT的对话代理的LLM的一个示例。在本工作中,我们使用一系列新颖的提示词来确定ChatGPT是否表现出启发式、偏见和其他决策效应。我们还对人类参与者测试了相同的提示词。在四项研究中,我们发现ChatGPT在做出估计时受到随机锚点的影响(锚定启发式,研究1);它判断两个事件同时发生的可能性高于任一事件单独发生的可能性,并且错误地受到显著轶事信息的影响(代表性启发式和可得性启发式,研究2);当一个项目的特征以正面而非负面的方式呈现时,它认为该项目更有效——尽管两种呈现包含相同的信息(框架效应,研究3);并且它更看重一个已拥有的物品而非一个新发现的物品,尽管这两个物品是相同的(禀赋效应,研究4)。在每项研究中,人类参与者表现出类似的效应。人类中的启发式及相关决策效应被认为是由认知和情感过程(如损失厌恶和努力减少)驱动的。一个缺乏这些过程的LLM也表现出此类效应,这一事实引发了对语言可能在人类中产生这些效应中发挥作用可能性的思考。

英文摘要:

A Large Language Model (LLM) is an artificial intelligence system that has been trained on vast amounts of natural language data, enabling it to generate human-like responses to written or spoken language input. GPT-3.5 is an example of an LLM that supports a conversational agent called ChatGPT. In this work, we used a series of novel prompts to determine whether ChatGPT shows heuristics, biases, and other decision effects. We also tested the same prompts on human participants. Across four studies, we found that ChatGPT was influenced by random anchors in making estimates (Anchoring Heuristic, Study 1); it judged the likelihood of two events occurring together to be higher than the likelihood of either event occurring alone, and it was erroneously influenced by salient anecdotal information (Representativeness and Availability Heuristic, Study 2); it found an item to be more efficacious when its features were presented positively rather than negatively - even though both presentations contained identical information (Framing Effect, Study 3); and it valued an owned item more than a newly found item even though the two items were identical (Endowment Effect, Study 4). In each study, human participants showed similar effects. Heuristics and related decision effects in humans are thought to be driven by cognitive and affective processes such as loss aversion and effort reduction. The fact that an LLM - which lacks these processes - also shows such effects invites consideration of the possibility that language may play a role in generating these effects in humans.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑