arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.03608cs.LGcs.ROcs.SYeess.SYmath.OC

论控制屏障函数的最优性、稳定性与可行性:一种基于自适应学习的方法

On the Optimality, Stability, and Feasibility of Control Barrier Functions: An Adaptive Learning-Based Approach

Mississippi State University(密西西比州立大学)

Alaa Eddine Chriat, Chuangchuang Sun

AI总结:

针对传统控制屏障函数(CBF)存在的最优性、稳定性、可行性局限及短视问题,提出用神经网络参数化class-K函数、结合强化学习的自适应多步CBF(AM-CBF)与多步训练单步执行范式,在一、二阶系统实验中性能优于传统CBF。

摘要:

安全性一直是基于学习的方法在实际应用中部署的关键问题。为解决这一问题,控制屏障函数(control barrier function, CBF)及其变体在安全关键控制领域受到了广泛关注。然而,由于CBF的短视单步特性,以及缺乏设计$\boldsymbol{\text{class-}\boldsymbol{\text{K}}}$函数的原则性方法,当前的CBF仍存在最优性、稳定性和可行性方面的根本局限。本文提出了一种新颖的统一方法——自适应多步控制屏障函数(Adaptive Multi-step Control Barrier Function, AM-CBF)来解决这些局限,我们用神经网络对$\text{class-}\text{K}$函数进行参数化,并将其与强化学习策略联合训练。此外,为缓解短视特性,我们提出了一种新颖的「多步训练、单步执行」范式,让CBF具备远见性,同时执行阶段仍只需求解单步凸二次规划。我们在多种场景下的一阶和二阶系统上评估了该方法,结果表明我们的方法在定性和定量层面均优于传统CBF。

英文摘要:

Safety has been a critical issue for the deployment of learning-based approaches in real-world applications. To address this issue, control barrier function (CBF) and its variants have attracted extensive attention for safety-critical control. However, due to the myopic one-step nature of CBF and the lack of principled methods to design the class-$\mathcal{K}$ functions, there are still fundamental limitations of current CBFs: optimality, stability, and feasibility. In this paper, we proposed a novel and unified approach to address these limitations with Adaptive Multi-step Control Barrier Function (AM-CBF), where we parameterize the class-$\mathcal{K}$ function by a neural network and train it together with the reinforcement learning policy. Moreover, to mitigate the myopic nature, we propose a novel \textit{multi-step training and single-step execution} paradigm to make CBF farsighted while the execution remains solving a single-step convex quadratic program. Our method is evaluated on the first and second-order systems in various scenarios, where our approach outperforms the conventional CBF both qualitatively and quantitatively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑