arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2305.03219cs.LGstat.ME
收藏

所有模型都是局部的:用循环局部验证取代外部验证

All models are local: time to replace external validation with recurrent local validation

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);University of Oxford(牛津大学);Duke University School of Medicine(杜克大学医学院);Oxford-Suzhou Centre for Advanced Research(牛津-苏州高等研究院);Stanford University School of Medicine(斯坦福大学医学院);Stanford Medicine(斯坦福医学院);Clinical Excellence Research Center(临床卓越研究中心)

Alex Youssef, Michael Pencina, Anshul Thakur, Tingting Zhu, David Clifton, Nigam H. Shah

AI总结:

本文提出以MLOps启发的循环局部验证替代外部验证,通过部署前和生命周期中的定期可靠性测试,确保医疗机器学习模型安全有效,防止数据变异带来的性能下降。

摘要:

外部验证常被推荐用于确保机器学习模型的可泛化性。然而,它既不能保证泛化性,也不等同于模型的临床实用性(任何临床决策支持工具的最终目标)。外部验证与当前医疗机器学习的需求不一致。首先,患者数据随时间、地域和设施而变化。这些变化导致单个固定模型性能的显著波动(尤其是主导临床机器学习的深度学习模型)。其次,更新的机器学习技术、当前市场力量和更新的监管框架使得频繁更新和监控单个已部署模型实例成为可能。我们认为外部验证不足以确立机器学习模型的安全性或有用的效用。修复外部验证范式的提议还不够深入。继续将其作为最终测试依赖可能会导致我们误入歧途。我们提出受MLOps启发的循环局部验证范式作为替代方案,该方案确保模型的有效性,同时防止性能破坏性的数据变异性。该范式依赖于每次部署前的特定站点可靠性测试,随后在已部署算法的整个生命周期中进行定期和循环检查。初始和循环可靠性测试可防止性能破坏性的分布偏移和概念漂移,这些漂移危及患者安全。

英文摘要:

External validation is often recommended to ensure the generalizability of ML models. However, it neither guarantees generalizability nor equates to a model's clinical usefulness (the ultimate goal of any clinical decision-support tool). External validation is misaligned with current healthcare ML needs. First, patient data changes across time, geography, and facilities. These changes create significant volatility in the performance of a single fixed model (especially for deep learning models, which dominate clinical ML). Second, newer ML techniques, current market forces, and updated regulatory frameworks are enabling frequent updating and monitoring of individual deployed model instances. We submit that external validation is insufficient to establish ML models' safety or utility. Proposals to fix the external validation paradigm do not go far enough. Continued reliance on it as the ultimate test is likely to lead us astray. We propose the MLOps-inspired paradigm of recurring local validation as an alternative that ensures the validity of models while protecting against performance-disruptive data variability. This paradigm relies on site-specific reliability tests before every deployment, followed by regular and recurrent checks throughout the life cycle of the deployed algorithm. Initial and recurrent reliability tests protect against performance-disruptive distribution shifts, and concept drifts that jeopardize patient safety.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑