arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2305.02593cs.CVcs.DL

如何为单书写者微调选择预训练手写识别模型

How to Choose Pretrained Handwriting Recognition Models for Single Writer Fine-Tuning

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia(摩德纳-雷焦艾米利亚大学);TEKLIA(TEKLIA公司);LITIS(LITIS实验室);Université de Rouen - Normandie(鲁昂诺曼底大学)

Vittorio Pippi, Silvia Cascianelli, Christopher Kermorvant, Rita Cucchiara

AI总结:

针对小体量单作者手写藏品标注数据不足、通用预训练HTR模型识别效果差的问题,本文通过实验分析真实与合成预训练数据及微调行数的影响,给出了仅用5行真实微调数据即可实现有效转录的预训练数据关键特征的量化结论。

摘要:

基于深度学习的手写文本识别(HTR)近期取得进展,相关模型在大型基准数据集上的现代手稿与历史手稿识别任务中均表现出色。但这类模型应用于具有语言、纸张载体、墨水、作者笔迹等特殊特征的手稿时,难以达到同等性能。对于历史档案馆中保存的珍贵但规模较小的文档藏品而言,这一问题十分关键——这类藏品获取足量标注训练数据的成本很高,部分情况下甚至无法实现。为解决这一难题,可行方案是先在大型数据集上预训练HTR模型,再在小型单作者藏品上对其进行微调。本文研究了大型真实基准数据集,以及通过风格化手写文本生成模型得到的合成数据集。通过大量实验分析(同时考虑微调行数),我们量化指出了这类数据的最关键特征:仅需5行真实微调数据,就能得到可有效转录小型藏品手稿的HTR模型。

英文摘要:

Recent advancements in Deep Learning-based Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) have led to models with remarkable performance on both modern and historical manuscripts in large benchmark datasets. Nonetheless, those models struggle to obtain the same performance when applied to manuscripts with peculiar characteristics, such as language, paper support, ink, and author handwriting. This issue is very relevant for valuable but small collections of documents preserved in historical archives, for which obtaining sufficient annotated training data is costly or, in some cases, unfeasible. To overcome this challenge, a possible solution is to pretrain HTR models on large datasets and then fine-tune them on small single-author collections. In this paper, we take into account large, real benchmark datasets and synthetic ones obtained with a styled Handwritten Text Generation model. Through extensive experimental analysis, also considering the amount of fine-tuning lines, we give a quantitative indication of the most relevant characteristics of such data for obtaining an HTR model able to effectively transcribe manuscripts in small collections with as little as five real fine-tuning lines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑