arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2304.04433math.OC
收藏

通过扰动消除半定规划的对偶间隙

Closing Duality Gaps of SDPs through Perturbation

Takashi Tsuchiya, Bruno F. Lourenço, Masakazu Muramatsu, Takayuki Okuno

AI总结:

本文研究了具有非零有限对偶间隙的半定规划(SDP)原始-对偶对,通过引入扰动恢复强可行性,证明了在奇异性度为一的假设下,最优值函数的极限版本 ${v_a}$ 是一个定义良好的单调递减连续双射函数,能够完全填补对偶间隙。

摘要:

设 $({\bf P},{\bf D})$ 为一个具有非零有限对偶间隙的半定规划(SDP)原始-对偶对。在这种情况下,${\bf P}$ 和 ${\bf D}$ 是弱可行的,如果我们扰动问题数据以恢复强可行性,作为扰动函数的(公共)最优值函数 $v$ 在零点(未扰动数据)处定义不明确,因为存在“两个不同的最优值” $v({\bf P})$ 和 $v({\bf D})$,其中 $v({\bf P})$ 和 $v({\bf D})$ 分别是 ${\bf P}$ 和 ${\bf D}$ 的最优值。因此,尽管 $v$ 在其他地方是连续的,但其在零点处失去了连续性。尽管如此,我们证明了在 ${\bf P}$ 和 ${\bf D}$ 的奇异性度均为一的假设下,$v$ 的极限版本 ${v_a}$ 是一个定义良好的单调递减连续双射函数,它将 $v({\bf P})$ 和 $v({\bf D})$ 连接起来,定义域为 $[0, π/2]$。定义域 $[0,π/2]$ 对应于以特定方式定义的扰动方向。因此,在温和的正则性条件下,${v_a}$ “完全填补”了非零对偶间隙。我们的结果是紧致的,因为存在一个奇异性度为二的实例,使得 ${v_a}$ 不连续。

英文摘要:

Let $({\bf P},{\bf D})$ be a primal-dual pair of SDPs with a nonzero finite duality gap. Under such circumstances, ${\bf P}$ and ${\bf D}$ are weakly feasible and if we perturb the problem data to recover strong feasibility, the (common) optimal value function $v$ as a function of the perturbation is not well-defined at zero (unperturbed data) since there are ``two different optimal values'' $v({\bf P})$ and $v({\bf D})$, where $v({\bf P})$ and $v({\bf D})$ are the optimal values of ${\bf P}$ and ${\bf D}$ respectively. Thus, continuity of $v$ is lost at zero though $v$ is continuous elsewhere. Nevertheless, we show that a limiting version ${v_a}$ of $v$ is a well-defined monotone decreasing continuous bijective function connecting $v({\bf P})$ and $v({\bf D})$ with domain $[0, π/2]$ under the assumption that both ${\bf P}$ and ${\bf D}$ have singularity degree one. The domain $[0,π/2]$ corresponds to directions of perturbation defined in a certain manner. Thus, ${v_a}$ ``completely fills'' the nonzero duality gap under a mild regularity condition. Our result is tight in that there exists an instance with singularity degree two for which ${v_a}$ is not continuous.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑