arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
今晚才能更新了~~大家休息下再来吧
arXiv 2304.03414cs.CL
收藏

迈向语料库规模的新闻报道选择偏差发现:以比较信息源对实体的报道内容为起点

Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start

University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学)

Sihao Chen, William Bruno, Dan Roth

AI总结:

本文提出一种无监督NLP概念框架,通过比较新闻信息源对争议实体的提及方式捕捉内容选择偏好,并在NELA-2020语料库上验证了该分布散度能有效指示信息源的意识形态倾向。

摘要:

新闻信息源在报道特定话题时,会经历筛选具有新闻价值信息的过程。由于其议程差异,该过程不可避免地表现出选择偏差,即新闻信息源在选择将哪些信息纳入新闻报道时的典型模式。要理解选择偏差的量级和影响,首先必须发现:(1) 在哪些话题上,信息源通常对“具有新闻价值”的信息有不同的界定;(2) 内容选择模式是否与新闻信息源的某些属性(如意识形态倾向等)相关。本文的目标是调查并讨论在不依赖标注数据的情况下,直接从大规模新闻语料库的新闻内容中发现媒体选择偏差模式时,构建可扩展 NLP 系统所面临的挑战。为促进该领域的研究,我们提出并研究了一个概念框架,在该框架中,我们比较信息源通常如何提及某些有争议的实体,并将其作为信息源内容选择偏好的指标。我们通过在 NELA-2020 上的案例研究实证展示了该框架的能力,NELA-2020 是一个包含来自全球 519 个新闻信息源的 180 万篇英文新闻文章的语料库。我们展示了一种无监督表示学习方法,用于捕捉信息源通常提及有争议实体的选择偏好。我们的实验表明,当跨实体和新闻信息源集体研究此类表示的分布散度时,它们可以作为单个信息源意识形态倾向的良好指标。我们希望我们的发现能为未来关于媒体选择偏差的研究提供见解。

英文摘要:

News sources undergo the process of selecting newsworthy information when covering a certain topic. The process inevitably exhibits selection biases, i.e. news sources' typical patterns of choosing what information to include in news coverage, due to their agenda differences. To understand the magnitude and implications of selection biases, one must first discover (1) on what topics do sources typically have diverging definitions of "newsworthy" information, and (2) do the content selection patterns correlate with certain attributes of the news sources, e.g. ideological leaning, etc. The goal of the paper is to investigate and discuss the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora, without relying on labeled data. To facilitate research in this domain, we propose and study a conceptual framework, where we compare how sources typically mention certain controversial entities, and use such as indicators for the sources' content selection preferences. We empirically show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide. We demonstrate an unsupervised representation learning method to capture the selection preferences for how sources typically mention controversial entities. Our experiments show that that distributional divergence of such representations, when studied collectively across entities and news sources, serve as good indicators for an individual source's ideological leaning. We hope our findings will provide insights for future research on media selection biases.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑