arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2304.00860cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS
收藏

设计与评估语音情感识别系统:基于IEMOCAP的现实检验案例研究

Designing and Evaluating Speech Emotion Recognition Systems: A reality check case study with IEMOCAP

Behavioral Signal Technologies(行为信号技术公司);Institute for Language and Speech Processing, Athena Research Center(雅典娜研究中心语言与语音处理研究所);University of Southern California(南加州大学)

Nikolaos Antoniou, Athanasios Katsamanis, Theodoros Giannakopoulos, Shrikanth Narayanan

AI总结:

针对语音情感识别缺乏统一评估标准的问题,本文以IEMOCAP为案例,通过批判性文献分析提出SER评估指南,并基于开源实现评估可复现性。

摘要:

目前迫切需要指南和标准测试集,以便对语音情感识别(SER)进行直接且公平的比较。尽管诸如交互式情感二元动作捕捉(IEMOCAP)数据库等资源已成为研究人员开发和测试SER模型的广泛采用的参考语料库,但已发表的研究揭示了在其使用中存在的各种假设和多样性,这些挑战了可复现性和泛化性。基于对以IEMOCAP为用例的SER最新进展的批判性审查,我们的工作旨在做出两项贡献:首先,通过对近期文献的分析(包括其中所做的假设和使用的指标),我们提供了一套SER评估指南。其次,利用近期发表的具有开源实现的研究,我们专注于SER中的可复现性评估。

英文摘要:

There is an imminent need for guidelines and standard test sets to allow direct and fair comparisons of speech emotion recognition (SER). While resources, such as the Interactive Emotional Dyadic Motion Capture (IEMOCAP) database, have emerged as widely-adopted reference corpora for researchers to develop and test models for SER, published work reveals a wide range of assumptions and variety in its use that challenge reproducibility and generalization. Based on a critical review of the latest advances in SER using IEMOCAP as the use case, our work aims at two contributions: First, using an analysis of the recent literature, including assumptions made and metrics used therein, we provide a set of SER evaluation guidelines. Second, using recent publications with open-sourced implementations, we focus on reproducibility assessment in SER.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑