人工缪斯：生成式人工智能聊天机器人已达到人类水平的创造力
Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity
AI总结：
本研究通过对比人类与六种生成式AI聊天机器人产生的想法，发现AI创造力已达人类水平，但GPT-4仍不及9.4%的人类，表明GAI可作为创造性过程的助手。
摘要：
一种普遍的观点认为人工智能无法具有创造力。我们通过将人类产生的想法与六个生成式人工智能（GAI）聊天机器人（$alpa.\!ai$、$Copy.\!ai$、ChatGPT（版本3和4）、$Studio.\!ai$ 和 YouChat）产生的想法进行比较，检验了这一假设。人类和经过专门训练的AI独立评估了想法的质量和数量。我们发现，尽管在想法产生方式上存在差异，但AI与人类产生的创造力之间没有质的差异。有趣的是，9.4%的人类比最具创造力的GAI（GPT-4）更具创造力。我们的研究结果表明，GAI是创造性过程中的宝贵助手。继续对GAI在创造性任务中的研究和开发，对于充分理解这项技术在塑造创造力未来方面的潜在益处和弊端至关重要。最后，我们讨论了GAI是否能够真正具有创造力的问题。
英文摘要：
A widespread view is that Artificial Intelligence cannot be creative. We tested this assumption by comparing human-generated ideas with those generated by six Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) chatbots: $alpa.\!ai$, $Copy.\!ai$, ChatGPT (versions 3 and 4), $Studio.\!ai$, and YouChat. Humans and a specifically trained AI independently assessed the quality and quantity of ideas. We found no qualitative difference between AI and human-generated creativity, although there are differences in how ideas are generated. Interestingly, 9.4 percent of humans were more creative than the most creative GAI, GPT-4. Our findings suggest that GAIs are valuable assistants in the creative process. Continued research and development of GAI in creative tasks is crucial to fully understand this technology's potential benefits and drawbacks in shaping the future of creativity. Finally, we discuss the question of whether GAIs are capable of being truly creative.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
