arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2303.04418eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

FUSQA:胎儿超声分割质量评估

FUSQA: Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation Quality Assessment

Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence(穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学)

Sevim Cengiz, Ibrahim Almakky, Mohammad Yaqub

AI总结:

本文提出 FUSQA 模型,将无参考掩码下的胎儿超声分割质量评估建模为二分类任务,以筛选良好分割并提升胎龄估计准确性。

摘要:

深度学习模型已在多种胎儿超声分割任务中展现出有效性。然而,其向未见过的新数据的泛化能力引发了关于临床采用有效性的疑问。通常,向未见过的新数据过渡需要耗时且成本高昂的质量保证流程,以验证过渡后的分割性能。分割质量评估工作主要集中在自然图像上,该问题通常被表述为 Dice 分数回归任务。本文提出一种简化的胎儿超声分割质量评估(Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation Quality Assessment,FUSQA)模型,以解决在没有掩码可供比较时的分割质量评估问题。我们将分割质量评估过程表述为一项自动分类任务,用于区分高质量和低质量分割掩码,从而实现更准确的胎龄估计。我们在使用不同超声机器从两家医院收集的两个数据集上验证了所提方法的性能。我们比较了不同架构,其中性能最佳的架构在区分来自未见过数据集的高质量与低质量分割掩码时取得了超过 90% 的分类准确率。此外,医生报告的胎龄与使用良好分割掩码基于 CRL 测量估计的胎龄之间仅相差 1.45 天。另一方面,当我们根据分割较差的掩码计算 CRL 时,这一差异增大并达到 7.73 天。因此,基于 AI 的方法有望辅助胎儿超声分割质量评估,并可能在未来的实时筛查中检测出较差的分割。

英文摘要:

Deep learning models have been effective for various fetal ultrasound segmentation tasks. However, generalization to new unseen data has raised questions about their effectiveness for clinical adoption. Normally, a transition to new unseen data requires time-consuming and costly quality assurance processes to validate the segmentation performance post-transition. Segmentation quality assessment efforts have focused on natural images, where the problem has been typically formulated as a dice score regression task. In this paper, we propose a simplified Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation Quality Assessment (FUSQA) model to tackle the segmentation quality assessment when no masks exist to compare with. We formulate the segmentation quality assessment process as an automated classification task to distinguish between good and poor-quality segmentation masks for more accurate gestational age estimation. We validate the performance of our proposed approach on two datasets we collect from two hospitals using different ultrasound machines. We compare different architectures, with our best-performing architecture achieving over 90% classification accuracy on distinguishing between good and poor-quality segmentation masks from an unseen dataset. Additionally, there was only a 1.45-day difference between the gestational age reported by doctors and estimated based on CRL measurements using well-segmented masks. On the other hand, this difference increased and reached up to 7.73 days when we calculated CRL from the poorly segmented masks. As a result, AI-based approaches can potentially aid fetal ultrasound segmentation quality assessment and might detect poor segmentation in real-time screening in the future.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑