arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.13087math.OCcs.LG

基于非线性函数逼近的高斯-牛顿时序差分学习

Gauss-Newton Temporal Difference Learning with Nonlinear Function Approximation

Center for Data Science, Peking University(北京大学数据科学中心);National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学);Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University(北京国际数学研究中心(北京大学))

Zhifa Ke, Junyu Zhang, Zaiwen Wen

AI总结:

本文提出高斯-牛顿时序差分学习方法,通过高斯-牛顿步骤优化均方贝尔曼误差变体,在非线性函数逼近下实现更优样本复杂度,并在多个强化学习基准上验证其收敛更快、奖励更高。

摘要:

本文提出了一种高斯-牛顿时序差分(GNTD)学习方法,用于解决具有非线性函数逼近的Q学习问题。在每次迭代中,该方法采用一个高斯-牛顿(GN)步骤来优化均方贝尔曼误差(MSBE)的一个变体,其中采用目标网络来避免双重采样。文中分析了非精确GN步骤,使得可以通过低成本的矩阵迭代安全且高效地计算GN更新。在温和条件下,针对多种非线性函数逼近,推导出了到全局最优Q函数的非渐近有限样本收敛性。特别是,对于采用relu激活的神经网络参数化,GNTD实现了改进的样本复杂度$\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-1})$,而现有神经TD方法的样本复杂度为$\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$。对于一般光滑函数逼近,GNTD还建立了$\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-1.5})$的样本复杂度。我们在多个强化学习基准上通过大量实验验证了该方法,实验结果表明GNTD比TD类方法具有更高的奖励和更快的收敛速度。

英文摘要:

In this paper, a Gauss-Newton Temporal Difference (GNTD) learning method is proposed to solve the Q-learning problem with nonlinear function approximation. In each iteration, our method takes one Gauss-Newton (GN) step to optimize a variant of Mean-Squared Bellman Error (MSBE), where target networks are adopted to avoid double sampling. Inexact GN steps are analyzed so that one can safely and efficiently compute the GN updates by cheap matrix iterations. Under mild conditions, non-asymptotic finite-sample convergence to the globally optimal Q function is derived for various nonlinear function approximations. In particular, for neural network parameterization with relu activation, GNTD achieves an improved sample complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-1})$, as opposed to the $\mathcal{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ sample complexity of the existing neural TD methods. An $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-1.5})$ sample complexity of GNTD is also established for general smooth function approximations. We validate our method via extensive experiments in several RL benchmarks, where GNTD exhibits both higher rewards and faster convergence than TD-type methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑