arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.12968q-bio.NCcs.HC
收藏

2D/3D视觉刺激下认知负荷的比较与分析

Comparison and Analysis of Cognitive Load under 2D/3D Visual Stimuli

Yu Liu, Chen Song, Yunpeng Yin, Herui Shi, Jinglin Sun, Han Wang, Peiguang Jing

AI总结:

本研究利用脑电图数据比较2D与3D视频在不同认知任务下的认知负荷,提出认知负荷指数(CLI),发现3D视频在简单观察任务中诱发更高认知负荷,而在计算任务中差异不明显。

摘要:

随着3D视频的日益普及,研究2D与3D视频观看体验的差异已成为一个重要问题。在本研究中,我们利用脑电图(EEG)数据,探讨了在不同认知任务下由2D和3D视频刺激引起的认知负荷。我们还引入了认知负荷指数(CLI),该指标结合了θ和α振荡来评估认知差异。实验中采用了四种视频刺激,每种刺激与典型的认知任务相关联。受试者分别观看2D和3D视频刺激,并记录相应的EEG数据。随后,我们分析了EEG数据在0.5-45 Hz频率范围内的功率,并利用CLI评估不同受试者的大脑活动。根据我们的实验与分析,涉及简单观察任务的视频(P <0.05)在受试者观看3D视频时持续诱发更高的认知负荷。然而,对于涉及计算任务的视频(P >0.05),2D和3D视频所诱发的认知负荷差异并不明显。因此,我们得出结论:3D视频通常能诱发更高的认知负荷,但差异的程度还取决于视频刺激的内容和观看目的。

英文摘要:

With the increasing prevalence of 3D videos, investigating the differences of viewing experiences between 2D and 3D videos has become an important issue. In this study, we explored the cognitive load induced by 2D and 3D video stimuli under various cognitive tasks utilizing electroencephalogram (EEG) data. We also introduced the Cognitive Load Index (CLI), a metric which combines θ and α oscillations to evaluate the cognitive differences. Four video stimuli, each associated with typical cognitive tasks were adopted in our experiments. Subjects were exposed to both 2D and 3D video stimuli, and the corresponding EEG data were recorded. Then, we analyzed the power within the 0.5-45 Hz frequency of EEG data, and CLI was utilized to evaluate the brain activity of different subjects. According to our experiments and analysis, videos that involve simple observational tasks (P <0.05) consistently induced a higher cognitive load in subjects when they were viewing 3D videos. However, for videos that involve calculation tasks (P >0.05), the differences in cognitive load induced by 2D and 3D video were not obvious. Thus, we concluded that 3D videos could generally induce a higher cognitive load, but the extent of the differences also depended on the contents of the video stimuli and the viewing purpose.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑