arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.06285cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

PAC 学习器是否学习边缘分布?

Do PAC-Learners Learn the Marginal Distribution?

Princeton University(普林斯顿大学);University of California, San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校);Yale University(耶鲁大学)

Max Hopkins, Daniel M. Kane, Shachar Lovett, Gaurav Mahajan

AI总结:

本文研究了在分布约束下PAC学习、一致收敛与密度估计的关系,证明传统基本定理失效但更细粒度的联系依然成立,为分布约束下的学习提供了新见解。

摘要:

PAC 学习的基本定理断言,概念类 $H$ 的可学习性等价于 $H$ 中经验误差向其均值的 $\textit{一致收敛}$,或者等价于 $\textit{密度估计}$ 问题,即针对 $H$ 中的事件学习底层的边缘分布。这一开创性的等价关系强烈依赖于 PAC 学习的“无分布”假设,即对抗者可以选择任意关于数据的边缘分布。遗憾的是,已知无分布模型在实践中过于对抗,无法预测现代机器学习算法的成功,但若没有基本定理,我们对分布约束下学习的理论理解仍然非常有限。在本研究中,我们重新审视了在无分布设置之外,当对抗者被限制从已知族 $\mathscr{P}$ 中选择边缘分布时,PAC 学习、一致收敛和密度估计之间的联系。我们证明,虽然传统的基本定理确实失效,但这三个基本概念之间更细粒度的联系依然成立:1. PAC 学习被严格夹在两种改进的密度估计模型之间,两者的区别仅在于学习器是否 $\textit{知道}$ $H$ 中被良好估计的事件集合。2. 在对 $H$ 和 $\mathscr{P}$ 的合理假设下,密度估计等价于 $\textit{一致估计}$,这是一致收敛的放松,允许使用非经验估计器。综合来看,我们的结果更清晰地描绘了基本定理如何扩展到无分布设置之外,并为在任意分布假设下学习这一经典难题提供了新见解。

英文摘要:

The Fundamental Theorem of PAC Learning asserts that learnability of a concept class $H$ is equivalent to the $\textit{uniform convergence}$ of empirical error in $H$ to its mean, or equivalently, to the problem of $\textit{density estimation}$, learnability of the underlying marginal distribution with respect to events in $H$. This seminal equivalence relies strongly on PAC learning's `distribution-free' assumption, that the adversary may choose any marginal distribution over data. Unfortunately, the distribution-free model is known to be overly adversarial in practice, failing to predict the success of modern machine learning algorithms, but without the Fundamental Theorem our theoretical understanding of learning under distributional constraints remains highly limited. In this work, we revisit the connection between PAC learning, uniform convergence, and density estimation beyond the distribution-free setting when the adversary is restricted to choosing a marginal distribution from a known family $\mathscr{P}$. We prove that while the traditional Fundamental Theorem indeed fails, a finer-grained connection between the three fundamental notions continues to hold: 1. PAC-Learning is strictly sandwiched between two refined models of density estimation, differing only in whether the learner $\textit{knows}$ the set of well-estimated events in $H$. 2. Under reasonable assumptions on $H$ and $\mathscr{P}$, density estimation is equivalent to $\textit{uniform estimation}$, a relaxation of uniform convergence allowing non-empirical estimators. Together, our results give a clearer picture of how the Fundamental Theorem extends beyond the distribution-free setting and shed new light on the classically challenging problem of learning under arbitrary distributional assumptions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑