arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.06280cs.LG

因果策略分类:两种偏移的故事

Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shifts

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology(以色列理工学院)

Guy Horowitz, Nir Rosenfeld

AI总结:

针对传统策略分类假设特征修改不改变真实结果的局限,提出因果策略分类框架,刻画策略行为与因果效应导致的两类分布偏移,提出平衡二者的端到端学习算法,实验验证了方法有效性。

摘要:

当用户能从特定预测结果中获益时,他们可能会采取行动以达成该结果,例如通过策略性地修改自身特征。因此,策略分类的目标是训练出对这类行为具有鲁棒性的预测模型。然而,传统框架假设改变特征并不会改变实际结果,将用户描述为“钻系统空子”的行为。本文移除了这一假设,研究真实结果确实会发生变化的因果策略场景下的学习问题。我们以准确率为核心目标,阐明了策略行为与因果效应是两种互补形式的分布偏移的底层成因。我们对这两种偏移进行了刻画,并提出一种学习算法,该算法能在两种作用力之间以及随时间推移实现平衡,且支持端到端训练。在合成数据与半合成数据上的实验验证了我们方法的有效性。

英文摘要:

When users can benefit from certain predictive outcomes, they may be prone to act to achieve those outcome, e.g., by strategically modifying their features. The goal in strategic classification is therefore to train predictive models that are robust to such behavior. However, the conventional framework assumes that changing features does not change actual outcomes, which depicts users as "gaming" the system. Here we remove this assumption, and study learning in a causal strategic setting where true outcomes do change. Focusing on accuracy as our primary objective, we show how strategic behavior and causal effects underlie two complementing forms of distribution shift. We characterize these shifts, and propose a learning algorithm that balances between these two forces and over time, and permits end-to-end training. Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic data demonstrate the utility of our approach.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑