The primary objective of phase I oncology studies is to establish the safety profile of a new treatment and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This is motivated by the development of cytotoxic agents based on the underlying assumption that the higher the dose, the greater the likelihood of efficacy and toxicity. However, evidence from the recent development of cancer immunotherapies that aim to stimulate patients' immune systems to fight cancer challenges this assumption, particularly further escalation after a certain dose level might not necessarily increase the efficacy. Dose escalation study of molecular targeted agents (MTA) often does not only rely on the safety profile. In this paper, we propose a simple and flexible model that uses multivariate Gaussian latent variables to integrate toxicity endpoint and efficacy biomarker. This model can be easily extended to incorporate additional immune biomarkers. By simultaneously considering multiple outcomes, the proposed method is better at identifying the biologically optimal dose, which results in better decision-making. Simulation studies showed that the proposed method has desirable operating characteristics by determining the target dose with an optimal risk-benefit trade-off. We have also implemented our proposed method in a user-friendly R Shiny tool.
Leveraging preclinical animal data for a phase I first-in-man trial is appealing yet challenging. A prior based on animal data may place large probability mass on values of the dose-toxicity model parameter(s), which appear infeasible in light of data accrued from the ongoing phase I clinical trial. In this paper, we seek to use animal data to improve decision making in a model-based dose-escalation procedure for phase I oncology trials. Specifically, animal data are incorporated via a robust mixture prior for the parameters of the dose-toxicity relationship. This prior changes dynamically as …
In Oncology, trials evaluating drug combinations are becoming more common. While combination therapies bring the potential for greater efficacy, they also create unique challenges for ensuring drug safety. In Phase-I dose escalation trials of drug combinations, model-based approaches enable efficient use of information gathered, but the models need to account for trial complexities: appropriate modeling of interactions becomes increasingly important with growing numbers of drugs being tested simultaneously in a given trial. In principle, we can use data from multiple arms testing varying combi…
In oncology dose-finding trials, due to staggered enrollment, it might be desirable to make dose-assignment decisions in real-time in the presence of pending toxicity outcomes, for example, when the dose-limiting toxicity is late-onset. Patients' time-to-event information may be utilized to facilitate such decisions. We review statistical frameworks for time-to-event modeling in dose-finding trials and summarize existing designs into two classes: TITE designs and POD designs. TITE designs are based on inference on toxicity probabilities, while POD designs are based on inference on dose-finding…
A utility-based Bayesian population finding (BaPoFi) method was proposed by Morita and Müller (2017, Biometrics, 1355-1365) to analyze data from a randomized clinical trial with the aim of identifying good predictive baseline covariates for optimizing the target population for a future study. The approach casts the population finding process as a formal decision problem together with a flexible probability model using a random forest to define a regression mean function. BaPoFi is constructed to handle a single continuous or binary outcome variable. In this paper, we develop BaPoFi-TTE as an e…
Cohort-based enrollment can slow down dose-finding trials since the outcomes of the previous cohort must be fully evaluated before the next cohort can be enrolled. This results in frequent suspension of patient enrollment. The issue is exacerbated in recent immune-oncology trials where toxicity outcomes can take a long time to observe. We propose a novel phase I design, the probability-of-decision toxicity probability interval (PoD-TPI) design, to accelerate phase I trials. PoD-TPI enables dose assignment in real-time in the presence of pending toxicity outcomes. With uncertain outcomes, the d…
An objective of phase I dose-finding trials is to find the maximum tolerated dose; the dose with a particular risk of toxicity. Frequently, this risk is assessed across the first cycle of therapy. However, in oncology, a course of treatment frequently consists of multiple cycles of therapy. In many cases, the overall risk of toxicity for a given treatment is not fully encapsulated by observations from the first cycle, and hence it is advantageous to include toxicity outcomes from later cycles in phase I trials. Extending the follow up period in a trial naturally extends the total length of the…
PKComb-BOIN12: A Pharmacokinetically Guided Bayesian Design for Dose Optimisation in Oncology Drug-Combination Trials
Global Statistical Sciences, Eli Lilly and Company（礼来公司全球统计科学部）；Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center（德克萨斯大学安德森癌症中心生物统计学系）；Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University（纽卡斯尔大学人口健康科学研究所）
In the development of new cancer treatment, an essential step is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) via phase I clinical trials. Generally speaking, phase I trial designs can be classified as either model-based or algorithm-based approaches. Model-based phase I designs are typically more efficient by using all observed data, while there is a potential risk of model misspecification that may lead to unreliable dose assignment and incorrect MTD identification. In contrast, most of the algorithm-based designs are less efficient in using cumulative information, because they tend to focu…
It is increasingly common for therapies in oncology to be given in combination. In some cases, patients can benefit from the interaction between two drugs, although often at the risk of higher toxicity. A large number of designs to conduct phase I trials in this setting are available, where the objective is to select the maximum tolerated dose combination (MTC). Recently, a number of model-free (also called model-assisted) designs have provoked interest, providing several practical advantages over the more conventional approaches of rule-based or model-based designs. In this paper, we demonstr…
In traditional dose-finding studies, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is determined within a fixed time observation window where DLT is often defined as a binary outcome. In the setting of oncology dose-finding trials, often patients in advanced stage of diseases are enrolled. Therefore, disease progression may occur within the DLT observation window leading to treatment discontinuation and rendering the patient unevaluable for DLT assessment. As a result, additional patients have to be enrolled, increasing the sample size. We propose and compare several practical methods for handling disease prog…
The commonplace description of phase 1 clinical trials in oncology as "primarily concerned with safety" is belied by their near universal adoption of dose-escalation practices which are inherently unsafe. In contrast with dose titration, cohort-wise dose escalation regards patients as exchangeable, an indefensible assumption in the face of widely appreciated inter-individual heterogeneity in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD). I have previously advanced this argument in terms of a precautionary coherence principle that brings the well-known coherence notion of Cheung (2005) into cont…
This manuscript introduces an \proglang{R} package called \pkg{trialr} that implements a collection of clinical trial methods in \proglang{Stan} and \proglang{R}. In this article, we explore three methods in detail. The first is the continual reassessment method for conducting phase I dose-finding trials that seek a maximum tolerable dose. The second is EffTox, a dose-finding design that scrutinises doses by joint efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The third is the augmented binary method for modelling the probability of treatment success in phase II oncology trials with reference to repeated mea…
