arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
看起来今天可以划水了
arXiv 2302.04440cs.LGcs.CV
收藏

特征似然散度:利用样本评估生成模型的泛化能力

Feature Likelihood Divergence: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samples

Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学);Mila(米拉研究所);McGill University(麦吉尔大学);Google Deepmind(谷歌DeepMind)

Marco Jiralerspong, Avishek Joey Bose, Ian Gemp, Chongli Qin, Yoram Bachrach, Gauthier Gidel

AI总结:

提出特征似然散度(FLD)指标,通过密度估计综合评估生成样本的新颖性、保真度和多样性,能有效识别过拟合,优于现有指标如FID。

摘要:

过去几年中,深度生成模型的发展取得了显著进展,这些模型能够生成高维、复杂且照片级逼真的数据。然而,当前评估此类模型的方法仍不完善:基于似然的标准指标并不总是适用,且很少与感知保真度相关;而基于样本的指标(如FID)对过拟合不敏感,即无法泛化到训练集之外。为解决这些局限性,我们提出了一种新指标,称为特征似然散度(FLD),这是一种参数化的基于样本的指标,利用密度估计提供全面的三分类评估,涵盖生成样本的新颖性(即与训练样本不同)、保真度和多样性。我们通过实验证明了FLD能够识别过拟合问题案例,即使先前提出的指标失效时也能有效。我们还对FLD在各种图像数据集和模型类别上进行了广泛评估,证明其能够匹配先前指标(如FID)的直觉,同时提供对生成模型更全面的评估。代码可在 https://github.com/marcojira/fld 获取。

英文摘要:

The past few years have seen impressive progress in the development of deep generative models capable of producing high-dimensional, complex, and photo-realistic data. However, current methods for evaluating such models remain incomplete: standard likelihood-based metrics do not always apply and rarely correlate with perceptual fidelity, while sample-based metrics, such as FID, are insensitive to overfitting, i.e., inability to generalize beyond the training set. To address these limitations, we propose a new metric called the Feature Likelihood Divergence (FLD), a parametric sample-based metric that uses density estimation to provide a comprehensive trichotomic evaluation accounting for novelty (i.e., different from the training samples), fidelity, and diversity of generated samples. We empirically demonstrate the ability of FLD to identify overfitting problem cases, even when previously proposed metrics fail. We also extensively evaluate FLD on various image datasets and model classes, demonstrating its ability to match intuitions of previous metrics like FID while offering a more comprehensive evaluation of generative models. Code is available at https://github.com/marcojira/fld.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑