arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2302.04221cond-mat.mtrl-scistat.AP
收藏

基于改进Monte Carlo方法的多保真度微结构诱导不确定性量化

Multi-fidelity microstructure-induced uncertainty quantification by advanced Monte Carlo methods

Anh Tran, Pieterjan Robbe, Hojun Lim

摘要:

量化与材料微观结构变化相关的不确定性可能是一项艰巨的计算任务,特别是在晶体塑性有限元法(CPFEM)中处理高级本构模型和精细网格分辨率时。关于材料性质和性能对网格分辨率和本构模型选择的敏感性,已经进行了大量的研究。然而,一个统一的方法,占各种保真度参数,如网格分辨率,积分时间步长,和本构模型同时是目前缺乏的。本文提出了一种新的不确定性量化(UQ)的方法计算的性质和性能的均匀化材料使用CPFEM,利用层次的近似与不同程度的保真度。特别是,我们说明了如何多级抽样方法,如多级蒙特卡罗(MLMC)和多指标蒙特卡罗(MIMC),可以应用于评估的影响,在多晶材料的微观结构的变化对均匀化材料性能的预测。我们表明,通过自适应地利用保真度层次,我们可以显着减少所需的微结构的数量,以达到一定的规定精度。最后,我们展示了我们的方法如何可以扩展到一个多保真度的框架,在那里我们允许从现象学塑性模型或基于位错密度的模型选择的基本本构模型。

英文摘要:

Quantifying uncertainty associated with the microstructure variation of a material can be a computationally daunting task, especially when dealing with advanced constitutive models and fine mesh resolutions in the crystal plasticity finite element method (CPFEM). Numerous studies have been conducted regarding the sensitivity of material properties and performance to the mesh resolution and choice of constitutive model. However, a unified approach that accounts for various fidelity parameters, such as mesh resolutions, integration time-steps, and constitutive models simultaneously is currently lacking. This paper proposes a novel uncertainty quantification (UQ) approach for computing the properties and performance of homogenized materials using CPFEM, that exploits a hierarchy of approximations with different levels of fidelity. In particular, we illustrate how multi-level sampling methods, such as multi-level Monte Carlo (MLMC) and multi-index Monte Carlo (MIMC), can be applied to assess the impact of variations in the microstructure of polycrystalline materials on the predictions of homogenized materials properties. We show that by adaptively exploiting the fidelity hierarchy, we can significantly reduce the number of microstructures required to reach a certain prescribed accuracy. Finally, we show how our approach can be extended to a multi-fidelity framework, where we allow the underlying constitutive model to be chosen from either a phenomenological plasticity model or a dislocation-density-based model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑