AGILEScience应用程序可从移动设备执行gamma-ray科学分析
The AGILEScience App to execute gamma-ray scientific analyses from mobile devices
摘要:
AGILE是2007年发射的一项空间任务,致力于高能天体物理学。AGILE团队参与了多信使活动,以便在最短的时间内发送和接收有关瞬变事件的科学警报。出于这个原因,AGILE团队开发了几个实时分析管道来分析数据和跟踪外部科学警报。然而,这些管道获得的结果是初步的,必须通过手动分析进行验证,这是工作流程的瓶颈。为了加快科学家进行的科学分析,AGILE团队开发了AGILEScience移动应用程序(适用于iOS和Android设备),为AGILE团队提供了一个受密码保护的部分,用于可视化自动化管道的结果。我们在这方面的贡献,AGILEScience应用程序,旨在使AGILE团队使用他们的移动设备执行一个完整的科学分析的改进功能。当分析完成时,系统发送电子邮件通知用户,用户可以通过应用程序可视化结果(例如图,表和HTML页面)。通过移动终端进行科学分析的可能性使AGILE研究人员能够远程进行快速科学分析,以验证自动化管道获得的初步结果。该工作流程缩短了AGILE团队对瞬态现象进行后续跟踪的总体反应时间。
英文摘要:
AGILE is a space mission launched in 2007 devoted to high-energy astrophysics. The AGILE Team is involved in the multi-messenger campaigns to send and receive science alerts about transient events in the shortest time possible. For this reason, the AGILE Team developed several real-time analysis pipelines to analyse data and follow-up external science alerts. However, the results obtained by these pipelines are preliminary and must be validated with manual analyses that are the bottleneck of the workflow. To speed up the scientific analysis performed by scientists, the AGILE Team developed the AGILEScience mobile application (for iOS and Android devices) that offers to the AGILE Team a password-protected section used to visualise the results of automated pipelines. We present in this contribution an improved functionality of the AGILEScience application that aims to enable the AGILE Team to execute a full scientific analysis using their mobile devices. When the analysis is completed, the system sends an email to notify the user that can visualise the results (e.g. plots, tables, and HTML pages) through the application. The possibility to perform scientific analysis from a mobile device enables the AGILE researchers to perform fast scientific analyses remotely to validate the preliminary results obtained with the automated pipelines. This workflow reduces the overall reaction time of the AGILE Team for the follow-up of transient phenomena.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。