arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2301.05036cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
收藏

每个人的声音都很重要:使用人口统计信息量化注释分歧

Everyone's Voice Matters: Quantifying Annotation Disagreement Using Demographic Information

University of Notre Dame(圣母大学);KAIST(韩国科学技术院);University of Minnesota(明尼苏达大学)

Ruyuan Wan, Jaehyung Kim, Dongyeop Kang

摘要:

在NLP注释中,通常有多个注释者标记文本,然后根据主要注释者的协议获得地面真值标签。但是,注释者是具有不同背景的个体,未成年人的意见不应被简单忽视。随着注释任务变得主观,并且在现代NLP任务中主题是有争议的,我们需要能够代表人们对主观问题的不同声音并预测多样性水平的NLP系统。本文考察了任务文本和注释者的人口统计学背景信息是否可以用来估计注释者之间的分歧程度。特别地,我们从注释者在五个主观数据集中的投票历史中提取不同意标签,然后微调语言模型来预测注释者的不同意。我们的研究结果表明,了解注释者的人口统计信息,如性别,种族和教育水平,有助于预测分歧。为了区分来自文本内容的固有争议和注释者不同观点的分歧,我们用注释者的人工人口统计数据的不同组合来模拟每个人的声音,并检查其微调的分歧预测器的方差。我们的论文旨在通过一种新的分歧预测机制来改进注释过程,以提高NLP系统的效率和包容性。我们的代码和数据集是公开的。

英文摘要:

In NLP annotation, it is common to have multiple annotators label the text and then obtain the ground truth labels based on the agreement of major annotators. However, annotators are individuals with different backgrounds, and minors' opinions should not be simply ignored. As annotation tasks become subjective and topics are controversial in modern NLP tasks, we need NLP systems that can represent people's diverse voices on subjective matters and predict the level of diversity. This paper examines whether the text of the task and annotators' demographic background information can be used to estimate the level of disagreement among annotators. Particularly, we extract disagreement labels from the annotators' voting histories in the five subjective datasets, and then fine-tune language models to predict annotators' disagreement. Our results show that knowing annotators' demographic information, like gender, ethnicity, and education level, helps predict disagreements. In order to distinguish the disagreement from the inherent controversy from text content and the disagreement in the annotators' different perspectives, we simulate everyone's voices with different combinations of annotators' artificial demographics and examine its variance of the finetuned disagreement predictor. Our paper aims to improve the annotation process for more efficient and inclusive NLP systems through a novel disagreement prediction mechanism. Our code and dataset are publicly available.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑