Selecting an effective training signal for machine learning tasks is difficult: expert annotations are expensive, and crowd-sourced annotations may not be reliable. Recent work has demonstrated that learning from a distribution over labels acquired from crowd annotations can be effective both for performance and uncertainty estimation. However, this has mainly been studied using a limited set of soft-labeling methods in an in-domain setting. Additionally, no one method has been shown to consistently perform well across tasks, making it difficult to know a priori which to choose. To fill these gaps, this paper provides the first large-scale empirical study on learning from crowd labels in the out-of-domain setting, systematically analyzing 8 soft-labeling methods on 4 language and vision tasks. Additionally, we propose to aggregate soft-labels via a simple average in order to achieve consistent performance across tasks. We demonstrate that this yields classifiers with improved predictive uncertainty estimation in most settings while maintaining consistent raw performance compared to learning from individual soft-labeling methods or taking a majority vote of the annotations. We additionally highlight that in regimes with abundant or minimal training data, the selection of soft labeling method is less important, while for highly subjective labels and moderate amounts of training data, aggregation yields significant improvements in uncertainty estimation over individual methods. Code can be found at https://github.com/copenlu/aggregating-crowd-annotations-ood.
Bar Ilan University（巴伊兰大学）；Microsoft Corporation（微软公司）
Coreference annotation is an important, yet expensive and time consuming, task, which often involved expert annotators trained on complex decision guidelines. To enable cheaper and more efficient annotation, we present CoRefi, a web-based coreference annotation suite, oriented for crowdsourcing. Beyond the core coreference annotation tool, CoRefi provides guided onboarding for the task as well as a novel algorithm for a reviewing phase. CoRefi is open source and directly embeds into any website, including popular crowdsourcing platforms. CoRefi Demo: aka.ms/corefi Video Tour: aka.ms/corefivide…
University of Essex（埃塞克斯大学）；Amazon Research（亚马逊研究院）；University of Regensburg（雷根斯堡大学）；Queen Mary University of London（伦敦玛丽女王大学）
Although several datasets annotated for anaphoric reference/coreference exist, even the largest such datasets have limitations in terms of size, range of domains, coverage of anaphoric phenomena, and size of documents included. Yet, the approaches proposed to scale up anaphoric annotation haven't so far resulted in datasets overcoming these limitations. In this paper, we introduce a new release of a corpus for anaphoric reference labelled via a game-with-a-purpose. This new release is comparable in size to the largest existing corpora for anaphoric reference due in part to substantial activity…
Tianjin University（天津大学）；Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)（哈尔滨工业大学（深圳））
Recent works of opinion expression identification (OEI) rely heavily on the quality and scale of the manually-constructed training corpus, which could be extremely difficult to satisfy. Crowdsourcing is one practical solution for this problem, aiming to create a large-scale but quality-unguaranteed corpus. In this work, we investigate Chinese OEI with extremely-noisy crowdsourcing annotations, constructing a dataset at a very low cost. Following zhang et al. (2021), we train the annotator-adapter model by regarding all annotations as gold-standard in terms of crowd annotators, and test the mod…
Adversarial Learning for Chinese NER from Crowd Annotations
School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University（苏州大学计算机科学与技术学院）；School of Computer Science and Technology, Heilongjiang University（黑龙江大学计算机科学与技术学院）；Alibaba Group（阿里巴巴集团）；Shenzhen Gowild Robotics Co. Ltd（深圳狗尾草智能科技有限公司）
Scaling Public Health Text Annotation: Zero-Shot Learning vs. Crowdsourcing for Improved Efficiency and Labeling Accuracy
University of Toronto（多伦多大学）；Dalla Lana School of Public Health（达拉·拉纳公共卫生学院）；Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME)（卫生政策、管理与评价研究所）；Faculty of Information（信息学院）；Schwartz Reisman Institute（施瓦茨·赖斯曼研究所）
Crowd sequential annotations can be an efficient and cost-effective way to build large datasets for sequence labeling. Different from tagging independent instances, for crowd sequential annotations the quality of label sequence relies on the expertise level of annotators in capturing internal dependencies for each token in the sequence. In this paper, we propose Modeling sequential annotation for sequence labeling with crowds (SA-SLC). First, a conditional probabilistic model is developed to jointly model sequential data and annotators' expertise, in which categorical distribution is introduce…
Wisdom of the AI Crowd (AI-CROWD) for Ground Truth Approximation in Content Analysis: A Research Protocol & Validation Using Eleven Large Language Models
University of Alcalá（阿尔卡拉大学）；Carlos III University of Madrid（马德里卡洛斯三世大学）
UCL（伦敦大学学院）；USC（南加州大学）；Facebook AI Research（脸书人工智能研究院）
In Dynamic Adversarial Data Collection (DADC), human annotators are tasked with finding examples that models struggle to predict correctly. Models trained on DADC-collected training data have been shown to be more robust in adversarial and out-of-domain settings, and are considerably harder for humans to fool. However, DADC is more time-consuming than traditional data collection and thus more costly per annotated example. In this work, we examine whether we can maintain the advantages of DADC, without incurring the additional cost. To that end, we introduce Generative Annotation Assistants (GA…
Most crowdsourcing learning methods treat disagreement between annotators as noisy labelings while inter-disagreement among experts is often a good indicator for the ambiguity and uncertainty that is inherent in natural language. In this paper, we propose a framework called Learning Ambiguity from Crowd Sequential Annotations (LA-SCA) to explore the inter-disagreement between reliable annotators and effectively preserve confusing label information. First, a hierarchical Bayesian model is developed to infer ground-truth from crowds and group the annotators with similar reliability together. By …
Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks
Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California（南加州大学信息科学研究所）；School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam（阿姆斯特丹大学传播研究学院）；Computer Science Department, University of Turin（都灵大学计算机科学系）
University of Southern California（南加州大学）；Google Research（谷歌研究院）
Majority voting and averaging are common approaches employed to resolve annotator disagreements and derive single ground truth labels from multiple annotations. However, annotators may systematically disagree with one another, often reflecting their individual biases and values, especially in the case of subjective tasks such as detecting affect, aggression, and hate speech. Annotator disagreements may capture important nuances in such tasks that are often ignored while aggregating annotations to a single ground truth. In order to address this, we investigate the efficacy of multi-annotator mo…
Goethe University Frankfurt am Main（法兰克福大学）；Technische Universität Darmstadt（达姆施塔特工业大学）
We introduce the well-established social scientific concept of social solidarity and its contestation, anti-solidarity, as a new problem setting to supervised machine learning in NLP to assess how European solidarity discourses changed before and after the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a global pandemic. To this end, we annotate 2.3k English and German tweets for (anti-)solidarity expressions, utilizing multiple human annotators and two annotation approaches (experts vs.\ crowds). We use these annotations to train a BERT model with multiple data augmentation strategies. Our augmented BERT mod…
