arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2212.09201math.STcs.LGstat.MLstat.TH
收藏

谱正则化核双样本检验

Spectral Regularized Kernel Two-Sample Tests

Pennsylvania State University(宾夕法尼亚州立大学)

Omar Hagrass, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Bing Li

AI总结:

本文研究基于RKHS嵌入的双样本检验最优性,证明MMD检验非最优,并提出利用协方差信息的谱正则化MMD检验,证明其极小极大最优且分离边界更小,同时给出自适应版本,实验验证其优越性。

摘要:

在过去十年中,一种在一般(即非欧几里得)域上处理非参数检验问题的方法获得了广泛关注,该方法基于概率分布的再生核希尔伯特空间(RKHS)嵌入概念。我们工作的主要目标是理解基于该方法构造的双样本检验的最优性。首先,我们证明流行的MMD(最大均值差异)双样本检验在以Hellinger距离衡量的分离边界方面不是最优的。其次,我们提出对MMD检验进行基于谱正则化的修改,通过考虑协方差信息(这是MMD检验未捕获的)来改进,并证明所提出的检验是极小极大最优的,其分离边界比MMD检验所达到的更小。第三,我们提出上述检验的自适应版本,该版本采用数据驱动策略选择正则化参数,并证明自适应检验在相差一个对数因子的意义下几乎极小极大最优。此外,我们的结果适用于检验的置换变体,其中检验阈值通过样本置换优雅地选择。通过在合成数据和真实数据上的数值实验,我们证明了所提出的检验相较于MMD检验及文献中其他流行检验具有更优越的性能。

英文摘要:

Over the last decade, an approach that has gained a lot of popularity to tackle nonparametric testing problems on general (i.e., non-Euclidean) domains is based on the notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) embedding of probability distributions. The main goal of our work is to understand the optimality of two-sample tests constructed based on this approach. First, we show the popular MMD (maximum mean discrepancy) two-sample test to be not optimal in terms of the separation boundary measured in Hellinger distance. Second, we propose a modification to the MMD test based on spectral regularization by taking into account the covariance information (which is not captured by the MMD test) and prove the proposed test to be minimax optimal with a smaller separation boundary than that achieved by the MMD test. Third, we propose an adaptive version of the above test which involves a data-driven strategy to choose the regularization parameter and show the adaptive test to be almost minimax optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, our results hold for the permutation variant of the test where the test threshold is chosen elegantly through the permutation of the samples. Through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data, we demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed test in comparison to the MMD test and other popular tests in the literature.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑