arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2212.08037cs.CL
收藏

属性问答:属性大语言模型的评价与建模

Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Models

Google Research(谷歌研究院)
Bernd Bohnet, Vinh Q. Tran, Pat Verga, Roee Aharoni, Daniel Andor, Livio Baldini Soares, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Jacob Eisenstein, Kuzman Ganchev, Jonathan Herz… 展开作者

Bernd Bohnet, Vinh Q. Tran, Pat Verga, Roee Aharoni, Daniel Andor, Livio Baldini Soares, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Jacob Eisenstein, Kuzman Ganchev, Jonathan Herzig, Kai Hui, Tom Kwiatkowski, Ji Ma, Jianmo Ni, Lierni Sestorain Saralegui, Tal Schuster, William W. Cohen, Michael Collins, Dipanjan Das, Donald Metzler, Slav Petrov, Kellie Webster

摘要:

大语言模型(LLM)已经显示出令人印象深刻的结果,同时需要很少或根本不需要直接监督。此外,越来越多的证据表明,LLM可能在寻求信息的情况下具有潜力。我们认为,LLM能够将其生成的文本属性化的能力在这种情况下可能至关重要。我们制定和研究归因QA作为一个关键的第一步,在发展归因LLM。我们提出了一个可重复的评估框架的任务和基准广泛的架构。我们把人类注释作为黄金标准,并表明相关的自动度量适合于开发。我们的实验工作给出了两个关键问题的具体答案(如何测量归因?,以及当前最先进的方法在归因上的表现如何?),并给出一些关于如何解决第三个问题的提示(如何构建具有属性的LLM?)。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive results while requiring little or no direct supervision. Further, there is mounting evidence that LLMs may have potential in information-seeking scenarios. We believe the ability of an LLM to attribute the text that it generates is likely to be crucial in this setting. We formulate and study Attributed QA as a key first step in the development of attributed LLMs. We propose a reproducible evaluation framework for the task and benchmark a broad set of architectures. We take human annotations as a gold standard and show that a correlated automatic metric is suitable for development. Our experimental work gives concrete answers to two key questions (How to measure attribution?, and How well do current state-of-the-art methods perform on attribution?), and give some hints as to how to address a third (How to build LLMs with attribution?).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑