arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2212.03063cs.CVcs.AI
收藏

面向分布外泛化的基于风格迁移的因果推断方法

Causal Inference via Style Transfer for Out-of-distribution Generalisation

Deakin University(迪肯大学)

Toan Nguyen, Kien Do, Duc Thanh Nguyen, Bao Duong, Thin Nguyen

AI总结:

针对分布外泛化中未观测混杂因素引发的虚假相关问题,提出以图像语义为中介变量、用风格迁移估计前门调整的因果推断方法,经基准实验验证有效。

摘要:

分布外(OOD)泛化旨在利用多个源域的知识,构建能在未见过的目标域上具备良好泛化能力的模型。为此,模型需要挖掘输入与标签之间的因果依赖关系,这类关系由输入的语义决定,且在不同域间保持不变。然而,统计方法或非因果方法往往无法捕捉这种依赖关系,且因未考虑训练过程中由未观测混杂因素带来的虚假相关性,表现不佳。现有知名的因果推断方法(如后门调整)因要求可观测混杂因素,无法用于消除这类虚假相关性。本文提出一种新方法,通过实现前门调整(FA)有效处理隐藏混杂因素。前门调整需要选取中介变量,我们将图像的语义信息作为该中介变量,无需观测混杂因素即可获取因果机制。此外,我们提出通过风格迁移算法,估计前门公式中中介变量与其他观测图像的组合项。我们将风格迁移用于估计前门调整的思路具有创新性,且适用于分布外泛化任务,在常用基准数据集上的大量实验结果验证了该方法的有效性。

英文摘要:

Out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation aims to build a model that can generalise well on an unseen target domain using knowledge from multiple source domains. To this end, the model should seek the causal dependence between inputs and labels, which may be determined by the semantics of inputs and remain invariant across domains. However, statistical or non-causal methods often cannot capture this dependence and perform poorly due to not considering spurious correlations learnt from model training via unobserved confounders. A well-known existing causal inference method like back-door adjustment cannot be applied to remove spurious correlations as it requires the observation of confounders. In this paper, we propose a novel method that effectively deals with hidden confounders by successfully implementing front-door adjustment (FA). FA requires the choice of a mediator, which we regard as the semantic information of images that helps access the causal mechanism without the need for observing confounders. Further, we propose to estimate the combination of the mediator with other observed images in the front-door formula via style transfer algorithms. Our use of style transfer to estimate FA is novel and sensible for OOD generalisation, which we justify by extensive experimental results on widely used benchmark datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑