arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2211.14805cs.CV

Rethinking Data Augmentation for Single-source Domain Generalization in Medical Image Segmentation

University of Liverpool(利物浦大学);Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU)(西交利物浦大学);Duke Kunshan University(昆山杜克大学)

Zixian Su, Kai Yao, Xi Yang, Qiufeng Wang, Jie Sun, Kaizhu Huang

英文摘要:

Single-source domain generalization (SDG) in medical image segmentation is a challenging yet essential task as domain shifts are quite common among clinical image datasets. Previous attempts most conduct global-only/random augmentation. Their augmented samples are usually insufficient in diversity and informativeness, thus failing to cover the possible target domain distribution. In this paper, we rethink the data augmentation strategy for SDG in medical image segmentation. Motivated by the class-level representation invariance and style mutability of medical images, we hypothesize that unseen target data can be sampled from a linear combination of $C$ (the class number) random variables, where each variable follows a location-scale distribution at the class level. Accordingly, data augmented can be readily made by sampling the random variables through a general form. On the empirical front, we implement such strategy with constrained B$\acute{\rm e}$zier transformation on both global and local (i.e. class-level) regions, which can largely increase the augmentation diversity. A Saliency-balancing Fusion mechanism is further proposed to enrich the informativeness by engaging the gradient information, guiding augmentation with proper orientation and magnitude. As an important contribution, we prove theoretically that our proposed augmentation can lead to an upper bound of the generalization risk on the unseen target domain, thus confirming our hypothesis. Combining the two strategies, our Saliency-balancing Location-scale Augmentation (SLAug) exceeds the state-of-the-art works by a large margin in two challenging SDG tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/Kaiseem/SLAug .

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑