arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2211.04079cs.CL
收藏

COPEN:在预训练的语言模型中探测概念知识

COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language Models

Tsinghua University(清华大学);Huawei Noah’s Ark Lab(华为诺亚方舟实验室)

Hao Peng, Xiaozhi Wang, Shengding Hu, Hailong Jin, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Qun Liu

摘要:

概念知识是人类认知的基础和知识库。然而,现有的知识探测工作只注重评估预训练语言模型(PLM)的事实知识,而忽略了概念知识。由于概念性知识往往以隐含的常识形式出现在文本背后,因此设计概念性知识的探测器是困难的。受知识表示图式的启发,我们设计了三个任务,分别探索PLM是否通过概念相似性组织实体,学习概念属性,并在上下文中概念化实体,全面评估PLM的概念知识。在任务中,我们收集并标注了24k个数据实例,涵盖了393个概念,这就是COPEN,一个概念知识探测的BENchmark。对不同规模和类型的PLM的大量实验表明,现有的PLM系统地缺乏概念知识,并遭受各种虚假的相关性。我们认为这是在PLM中实现类人认知的关键瓶颈。COPEN和我们的代码在https://github.com/THU-KEG/COPEN上公开发布。

英文摘要:

Conceptual knowledge is fundamental to human cognition and knowledge bases. However, existing knowledge probing works only focus on evaluating factual knowledge of pre-trained language models (PLMs) and ignore conceptual knowledge. Since conceptual knowledge often appears as implicit commonsense behind texts, designing probes for conceptual knowledge is hard. Inspired by knowledge representation schemata, we comprehensively evaluate conceptual knowledge of PLMs by designing three tasks to probe whether PLMs organize entities by conceptual similarities, learn conceptual properties, and conceptualize entities in contexts, respectively. For the tasks, we collect and annotate 24k data instances covering 393 concepts, which is COPEN, a COnceptual knowledge Probing bENchmark. Extensive experiments on different sizes and types of PLMs show that existing PLMs systematically lack conceptual knowledge and suffer from various spurious correlations. We believe this is a critical bottleneck for realizing human-like cognition in PLMs. COPEN and our codes are publicly released at https://github.com/THU-KEG/COPEN.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑