arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.07481cs.CV

InFIP:一种基于内在特征的可解释DNN知识产权保护方法

InFIP: An Explainable DNN Intellectual Property Protection Method based on Intrinsic Features

College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(南京航空航天大学计算机科学与技术学院)

Mingfu Xue, Xin Wang, Yinghao Wu, Shifeng Ni, Yushu Zhang, Weiqiang Liu

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于可解释AI的DNN知识产权保护方法InFIP,利用Deep Taylor Decomposition提取模型内在特征作为指纹,无需修改模型即可实现可解释的所有权验证,且对多种攻击具有鲁棒性。

摘要:

近年来,深度神经网络(DNNs)的知识产权(IP)保护引起了严重关注。现有的大多数工作在DNN模型中嵌入水印以进行IP保护,这需要修改模型且缺乏可解释性。本文首次提出了一种基于可解释人工智能的、可解释的DNN知识产权保护方法。与现有工作相比,该方法不修改DNN模型,且所有权验证的决策是可解释的。我们利用Deep Taylor Decomposition提取DNN模型的内在特征。由于内在特征由模型决策的独特解释组成,因此该内在特征可视为模型的指纹。如果疑似模型的指纹与原始模型相同,则该疑似模型被视为盗版模型。实验结果表明,该指纹可成功用于验证模型的所有权,且模型的测试准确率不受影响。此外,所提方法对微调攻击、剪枝攻击、水印覆盖攻击和自适应攻击具有鲁棒性。

英文摘要:

Intellectual property (IP) protection for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has raised serious concerns in recent years. Most existing works embed watermarks in the DNN model for IP protection, which need to modify the model and lack of interpretability. In this paper, for the first time, we propose an interpretable intellectual property protection method for DNN based on explainable artificial intelligence. Compared with existing works, the proposed method does not modify the DNN model, and the decision of the ownership verification is interpretable. We extract the intrinsic features of the DNN model by using Deep Taylor Decomposition. Since the intrinsic feature is composed of unique interpretation of the model's decision, the intrinsic feature can be regarded as fingerprint of the model. If the fingerprint of a suspected model is the same as the original model, the suspected model is considered as a pirated model. Experimental results demonstrate that the fingerprints can be successfully used to verify the ownership of the model and the test accuracy of the model is not affected. Furthermore, the proposed method is robust to fine-tuning attack, pruning attack, watermark overwriting attack, and adaptive attack.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑