arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.04470cs.LG

Actor-Critic还是Critic-Actor?一个关于两种时间尺度的故事

Actor-Critic or Critic-Actor? A Tale of Two Time Scales

Indian Institute of Science(印度科学学院);Indian Institute of Technology Bombay(印度理工学院孟买分校)

Shalabh Bhatnagar, Vivek S. Borkar, Soumyajit Guin

AI总结:

该研究重新审视表格型actor-critic算法的双时间尺度公式,提出反转时间尺度的critic-actor算法,证明其收敛性,实验表明该算法在准确性和计算量上与actor-critic相当。

摘要:

我们重新审视了表格型actor-critic算法的标准公式,该算法是一种双时间尺度随机近似方法,其中价值函数在更快的时间尺度上计算,策略在更慢的时间尺度上计算,这模拟了策略迭代。我们发现,反转时间尺度实际上会模拟价值迭代,并且是一种合理的算法。我们提供了收敛性证明,并在有和没有函数近似(使用线性和非线性函数近似器)的情况下对两者进行了实证比较,观察到我们提出的critic-actor算法在准确性和计算量方面与actor-critic表现相当。

英文摘要:

We revisit the standard formulation of tabular actor-critic algorithm as a two time-scale stochastic approximation with value function computed on a faster time-scale and policy computed on a slower time-scale. This emulates policy iteration. We observe that reversal of the time scales will in fact emulate value iteration and is a legitimate algorithm. We provide a proof of convergence and compare the two empirically with and without function approximation (with both linear and nonlinear function approximators) and observe that our proposed critic-actor algorithm performs on par with actor-critic in terms of both accuracy and computational effort.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑