arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.04461astro-ph.SR
收藏

太阳耀斑中色球辐射损失的不同配方的评价

Evaluation of different recipes for chromospheric radiative losses in solar flares

J. Tian, J. Hong, Y. Li, M. D. Ding

摘要:

上下文辐射损失是耀斑数值模拟中不可缺少的一部分。详细的计算在计算上可能是昂贵的,特别是在色球层。耀斑色球辐射损失已有一些近似公式,但其在耀斑模拟中的可行性还有待进一步评估。目标。我们的目的是评估不同的配方的色球辐射损失的耀斑模拟的性能。方法.我们比较了详细的辐射损失和近似配方计算的束流加热耀斑的大气结构和线轮廓。结果GF90和HCD 22配方与详细配方相比,都提供了可接受的总辐射损失,但在不同的大气层在不同的演变阶段,这导致温度和线强度的错误估计存在差异。当温度超过10^5 K时,GF90的配方大大高估了上色球层的冷却,这也影响了耀斑的演化和谱线的不对称性。中色球层的辐射加热只在初始阶段起作用,可以忽略不计。然而,来自莱曼连续体的辐射加热可以在过渡区附近占主导地位。

英文摘要:

Context. Radiative losses are an indispensable part in the numerical simulation of flares. Detailed calculations could be computationally expensive, especially in the chromosphere. There have been some approximate recipes for chromospheric radiative losses in flares, yet their feasibility in flare simulations needs further evaluation. Aims. We aim to evaluate the performance of different recipes for chromospheric radiative losses in flare simulations. Methods. We compare the atmospheric structure and line profiles in beam-heated flares calculated with detailed radiative losses and the approximate recipes. Results. Both GF90 and HCD22 recipes provide acceptable total radiative losses compared with detailed one, but there are discrepancies in the different atmospheric layers during the different evolutionary phases, which leads to misestimations of temperature and line intensity. The recipe of GF90 overestimates the coolings in the upper chromosphere greatly when temperature exceeds 10^5 K, which also affects the flare evolution and line asymmetries. Radiative heating in the middle chromosphere only functions in the initial stage and could be safely neglected. However, radiative heating from Lyman continuum could dominate near the transition region.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑