arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2210.00580cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

GFlowNets与变分推断

GFlowNets and variational inference

Mila(米拉计算研究所);Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学);Google Research(谷歌研究院);CIFAR(加拿大高级研究所)

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Salem Lahlou, Tristan Deleu, Xu Ji, Edward Hu, Katie Everett, Dinghuai Zhang, Yoshua Bengio

AI总结:

本文建立变分推断与生成流网络的联系,证明特定情形下VI等价于GFlowNets特例,指出GFlowNets更适合离策略训练且利于捕获多模态分布多样性。

摘要:

本文在两类概率算法间建立联系:一是通常用于建模连续空间分布的(分层)变分推断(VI),二是用于建模图等离散结构分布的生成流网络(GFlowNets)。我们证明,在特定情形下,VI算法等价于GFlowNets的特例,等价性体现在学习目标的期望梯度相等。随后我们指出两类算法的差异并通过实验展示这些差异的来源:值得注意的是,借鉴强化学习思想的GFlowNets,比VI更适合离策略训练,且不会出现重要采样带来的高梯度方差代价。我们认为GFlowNets的这一特性,能为捕获多模态目标分布的多样性提供优势。

英文摘要:

This paper builds bridges between two families of probabilistic algorithms: (hierarchical) variational inference (VI), which is typically used to model distributions over continuous spaces, and generative flow networks (GFlowNets), which have been used for distributions over discrete structures such as graphs. We demonstrate that, in certain cases, VI algorithms are equivalent to special cases of GFlowNets in the sense of equality of expected gradients of their learning objectives. We then point out the differences between the two families and show how these differences emerge experimentally. Notably, GFlowNets, which borrow ideas from reinforcement learning, are more amenable than VI to off-policy training without the cost of high gradient variance induced by importance sampling. We argue that this property of GFlowNets can provide advantages for capturing diversity in multimodal target distributions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑