arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2210.00522stat.ME
收藏

多项研究间的可复制性

Replicability Across Multiple Studies

Marina Bogomolov, Ruth Heller

AI总结:

针对元分析发现可能由单研究信号驱动、缺乏可复制性的问题,本文综述了确立科学发现可复制性的两类分析方法,并指出当前不足与未来方向。

摘要:

元分析(Meta-analysis)是许多科学学科中的常规操作。这类分析颇具吸引力,因为即便所有单项研究的统计功效不足,仍有可能获得发现。然而,元分析得到的发现可能完全由某一项研究中的信号驱动,因此不具备可复制性。尽管迄今为止开展的绝大多数元分析都未对其研究结果的可复制性进行推断,但这一推断是可行的。我们对可用于确立科学发现可复制性的分析方法进行了选择性综述。我们介绍了适用于两种场景的方法:一种是多项研究考察单一结局的场景(这在医疗干预措施的系统综述中十分常见),另一种是多项研究各自考察多个特征的场景(如基因组学应用中的情况)。我们还讨论了当前存在的一些不足与未来的研究方向。

英文摘要:

Meta-analysis is routinely performed in many scientific disciplines. This analysis is attractive since discoveries are possible even when all the individual studies are underpowered. However, the meta-analytic discoveries may be entirely driven by signal in a single study, and thus non-replicable. Although the great majority of meta-analyses carried out to date do not infer on the replicability of their findings, it is possible to do so. We provide a selective overview of analyses that can be carried out towards establishing replicability of the scientific findings. We describe methods for the setting where a single outcome is examined in multiple studies (as is common in systematic reviews of medical interventions), as well as for the setting where multiple studies each examine multiple features (as in genomics applications). We also discuss some of the current shortcomings and future directions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑