通过开放知识库和AI绘制气候变化研究地图：基于证据的研发政策制定的优势和局限性
Mapping Climate Change Research via Open Repositories & AI: advantages and limitations for an evidence-based R&D policy-making
摘要：
在过去几年中，有几项举措已开始以开放的方式提供研究成果数据和元数据。这些举措开发的平台正在向更广泛的公众开放科学成果，它们可以成为科学、技术和创新（科技创新）领域循证决策的宝贵资产。这些资源确实可以促进知识发现，并帮助确定现有的研发资产和感兴趣的具体研究领域内的相关行为者。理想的情况是，为了全面了解整个科学、技术和创新生态系统，应将每一种资源提供的信息合并起来，并进行相应的分析。为确保这一点，至少应保证各数据来源之间有一定程度的互操作性，以便更好地汇总和补充数据，并使为决策提供的证据更加完整和可靠。在这里，我们研究这是否是在整个丹麦STI生态系统的情况下，通过使用4个流行的开放获取STI数据源，即OpenAire，Open Alex，CORDIS和Kohesio的情况下，映射气候行动研究。
英文摘要：
In the last few years, several initiatives have been starting to offer access to research outputs data and metadata in an open fashion. The platforms developed by those initiatives are opening up scientific production to the wider public and they can be an invaluable asset for evidence-based policy-making in Science, Technology and Innovation (STI). These resources can indeed facilitate knowledge discovery and help identify available R&D assets and relevant actors within specific research niches of interest. Ideally, to gain a comprehensive view of entire STI ecosystems, the information provided by each of these resources should be combined and analysed accordingly. To ensure so, at least a certain degree of interoperability should be guaranteed across data sources, so that data could be better aggregated and complemented and that evidence provided towards policy-making is more complete and reliable. Here, we study whether this is the case for the case of mapping Climate Action research in the whole Denmark STI ecosystem, by using 4 popular open access STI data sources, namely OpenAire, Open Alex, CORDIS and Kohesio.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
