arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2209.06375cs.CVastro-ph.IM
收藏

Self-Supervised Clustering on Image-Subtracted Data with Deep-Embedded Self-Organizing Map

Monash University(莫纳什大学);OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery(OzGrav:ARC引力波发现卓越中心);University of Warwick(华威大学);Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE)(全球分布式开放研究与教育研究所(IGDORE));University of Sheffield(谢菲尔德大学)
Y. -L. Mong, K. Ackley, T. L. Killestein, D. K. Galloway, M. Dyer, R. Cutter, M. J. I. Brown, J. Lyman, K. Ulaczyk, D. Steeghs, V. Dhillon, P. O'Brien, G. Ramsa… 展开作者

Y. -L. Mong, K. Ackley, T. L. Killestein, D. K. Galloway, M. Dyer, R. Cutter, M. J. I. Brown, J. Lyman, K. Ulaczyk, D. Steeghs, V. Dhillon, P. O'Brien, G. Ramsay, K. Noysena, R. Kotak, R. Breton, L. Nuttall, E. Palle, D. Pollacco, E. Thrane, S. Awiphan, U. Burhanudin, P. Chote, A. Chrimes, E. Daw, C. Duffy, R. Eyles-Ferris, B. P. Gompertz, T. Heikkila, P. Irawati, M. Kennedy, A. Levan, S. Littlefair, L. Makrygianni, T. Marsh, D. Mata Sanchez, S. Mattila, J. R. Maund, J. McCormac, D. Mkrtichian, J. Mullaney, E. Rol, U. Sawangwit, E. Stanway, R. Starling, P. Strom, S. Tooke, K. Wiersema

英文摘要:

Developing an effective automatic classifier to separate genuine sources from artifacts is essential for transient follow-ups in wide-field optical surveys. The identification of transient detections from the subtraction artifacts after the image differencing process is a key step in such classifiers, known as real-bogus classification problem. We apply a self-supervised machine learning model, the deep-embedded self-organizing map (DESOM) to this "real-bogus" classification problem. DESOM combines an autoencoder and a self-organizing map to perform clustering in order to distinguish between real and bogus detections, based on their dimensionality-reduced representations. We use 32x32 normalized detection thumbnails as the input of DESOM. We demonstrate different model training approaches, and find that our best DESOM classifier shows a missed detection rate of 6.6% with a false positive rate of 1.5%. DESOM offers a more nuanced way to fine-tune the decision boundary identifying likely real detections when used in combination with other types of classifiers, for example built on neural networks or decision trees. We also discuss other potential usages of DESOM and its limitations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑