arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2209.06148cs.IR
收藏

实体标记:抽取文本中的实体而不提及监督

Entity Tagging: Extracting Entities in Text Without Mention Supervision

Christina Du, Kashyap Popat, Louis Martin, Fabio Petroni

摘要:

文本中所有实体的检测和消歧对于广泛的应用来说是一项至关重要的任务。问题的典型表述包括两个阶段:检测提及边界和将所有提及链接到知识库。长期以来,提及检测一直被认为是提取一段文本中所有实体的必要步骤,即使关于提及跨度的信息被一些下游应用程序忽略,这些应用程序仅关注所提取的实体集合。在本文中,我们表明,在这种情况下,提到边界的检测不会带来任何可观的性能增益提取实体,因此可以跳过。为了进行我们的分析,我们提出了一个“实体标记”的问题,其中模型纯粹是在一组提取的实体上进行评估,而不考虑提及。我们比较了一个国家的最先进的提及感知的实体链接解决方案对GET,一个提及不可知的序列到序列模型,简单地输出一个列表的消歧的实体给定的输入上下文。我们发现,当在多个基准测试中对完全和部分注释的数据集进行训练时,这些模型的性能相当,这表明GET可以在没有明确提及边界监督的情况下提取具有强大性能的消歧实体。

英文摘要:

Detection and disambiguation of all entities in text is a crucial task for a wide range of applications. The typical formulation of the problem involves two stages: detect mention boundaries and link all mentions to a knowledge base. For a long time, mention detection has been considered as a necessary step for extracting all entities in a piece of text, even if the information about mention spans is ignored by some downstream applications that merely focus on the set of extracted entities. In this paper we show that, in such cases, detection of mention boundaries does not bring any considerable performance gain in extracting entities, and therefore can be skipped. To conduct our analysis, we propose an "Entity Tagging" formulation of the problem, where models are evaluated purely on the set of extracted entities without considering mentions. We compare a state-of-the-art mention-aware entity linking solution against GET, a mention-agnostic sequence-to-sequence model that simply outputs a list of disambiguated entities given an input context. We find that these models achieve comparable performance when trained both on a fully and partially annotated dataset across multiple benchmarks, demonstrating that GET can extract disambiguated entities with strong performance without explicit mention boundaries supervision.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑