参与者对执行积极心理学练习的机器人教练的感知：一项定性分析
Participant Perceptions of a Robotic Coach Conducting Positive Psychology Exercises: A Qualitative Analysis
AI总结：
本文通过对20名参与者与执行积极心理学练习的机器人教练单次互动的定性分析，揭示了其感知的优缺点及对情感适应的无明确偏好，为机器人教练未来设计提供了见解与研究方向。
摘要：
本文呈现了参与者对执行积极心理学练习的机器人教练感知的定性分析，为机器人教练的未来设计提供见解。参与者（n=20）在实验室环境中参与了单次（平均31±10分钟）人机交互研究。我们基于以用户为中心的设计研究以及与专业教练的合作，创建了机器人教练的设计及其情感适应功能。我们转录了研究后参与者访谈并进行了主题分析。我们讨论了分析结果，呈现了参与者认为特别有帮助的方面（如机器人提出了正确的问题，帮助他们想到生活中全新的积极事物）以及需要改进的地方（如机器人的话语内容应更具响应性）。我们发现参与者对情感适应或无情感适应没有明确偏好，这可能是因为在适应情况下，用户的积极和消极感知都被放大了。基于我们的定性分析，我们强调了对机器人教练未来设计的见解以及未来研究的方向（如考察具有不同人格特质的参与者或经历孤立的参与者如何从与机器人教练的互动中获益）。
英文摘要：
This paper presents a qualitative analysis of participants' perceptions of a robotic coach conducting Positive Psychology exercises, providing insights for the future design of robotic coaches. Participants (n = 20) took part in a single-session (avg. 31 +- 10 minutes) Human-Robot Interaction study in a laboratory setting. We created the design of the robotic coach, and its affective adaptation, based on user-centred design research and collaboration with a professional coach. We transcribed post-study participant interviews and conducted a Thematic Analysis. We discuss the results of that analysis, presenting aspects participants found particularly helpful (e.g., the robot asked the correct questions and helped them think of new positive things in their life), and what should be improved (e.g., the robot's utterance content should be more responsive). We found that participants had no clear preference for affective adaptation or no affective adaptation, which may be due to both positive and negative user perceptions being heightened in the case of adaptation. Based on our qualitative analysis, we highlight insights for the future design of robotic coaches, and areas for future investigation (e.g., examining how participants with different personality traits, or participants experiencing isolation, could benefit from an interaction with a robotic coach).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
