arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2209.01937eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

Supervised Contrastive Learning to Classify Paranasal Anomalies in the Maxillary Sinus

Hamburg University of Technology(汉堡工业大学);University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf(汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心);University Heart and Vascular Center(大学心血管中心)
Debayan Bhattacharya, Benjamin Tobias Becker, Finn Behrendt, Marcel Bengs, Dirk Beyersdorff, Dennis Eggert, Elina Petersen, Florian Jansen, Marvin Petersen, Bas… 展开作者

Debayan Bhattacharya, Benjamin Tobias Becker, Finn Behrendt, Marcel Bengs, Dirk Beyersdorff, Dennis Eggert, Elina Petersen, Florian Jansen, Marvin Petersen, Bastian Cheng, Christian Betz, Alexander Schlaefer, Anna Sophie Hoffmann

英文摘要:

Using deep learning techniques, anomalies in the paranasal sinus system can be detected automatically in MRI images and can be further analyzed and classified based on their volume, shape and other parameters like local contrast. However due to limited training data, traditional supervised learning methods often fail to generalize. Existing deep learning methods in paranasal anomaly classification have been used to diagnose at most one anomaly. In our work, we consider three anomalies. Specifically, we employ a 3D CNN to separate maxillary sinus volumes without anomalies from maxillary sinus volumes with anomalies. To learn robust representations from a small labelled dataset, we propose a novel learning paradigm that combines contrastive loss and cross-entropy loss. Particularly, we use a supervised contrastive loss that encourages embeddings of maxillary sinus volumes with and without anomaly to form two distinct clusters while the cross-entropy loss encourages the 3D CNN to maintain its discriminative ability. We report that optimising with both losses is advantageous over optimising with only one loss. We also find that our training strategy leads to label efficiency. With our method, a 3D CNN classifier achieves an AUROC of 0.85 while a 3D CNN classifier optimised with cross-entropy loss achieves an AUROC of 0.66.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑