arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2207.14472eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

Beyond CNNs: Exploiting Further Inherent Symmetries in Medical Image Segmentation

Macquarie University(麦考瑞大学);University of Technology Sydney(悉尼科技大学);Shanghai AI Laboratory(上海人工智能实验室)

Shuchao Pang, Anan Du, Mehmet A. Orgun, Yan Wang, Quan Z. Sheng, Shoujin Wang, Xiaoshui Huang, Zhenmei Yu

英文摘要:

Automatic tumor or lesion segmentation is a crucial step in medical image analysis for computer-aided diagnosis. Although the existing methods based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have achieved the state-of-the-art performance, many challenges still remain in medical tumor segmentation. This is because, although the human visual system can detect symmetries in 2D images effectively, regular CNNs can only exploit translation invariance, overlooking further inherent symmetries existing in medical images such as rotations and reflections. To solve this problem, we propose a novel group equivariant segmentation framework by encoding those inherent symmetries for learning more precise representations. First, kernel-based equivariant operations are devised on each orientation, which allows it to effectively address the gaps of learning symmetries in existing approaches. Then, to keep segmentation networks globally equivariant, we design distinctive group layers with layer-wise symmetry constraints. Finally, based on our novel framework, extensive experiments conducted on real-world clinical data demonstrate that a Group Equivariant Res-UNet (named GER-UNet) outperforms its regular CNN-based counterpart and the state-of-the-art segmentation methods in the tasks of hepatic tumor segmentation, COVID-19 lung infection segmentation and retinal vessel detection. More importantly, the newly built GER-UNet also shows potential in reducing the sample complexity and the redundancy of filters, upgrading current segmentation CNNs and delineating organs on other medical imaging modalities.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑