arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2205.09641cs.CL
收藏

SNaC:用于叙述性摘要的相干错误检测

SNaC: Coherence Error Detection for Narrative Summarization

The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校)

Tanya Goyal, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett

摘要:

由于缺乏适当的评价框架,在总结长篇案文方面的进展受到阻碍。当必须编写一个长摘要以适当涵盖文本的各个方面时,该摘要需要提供一个连贯的叙述,以便读者能够理解,但目前的自动和人工评价方法无法确定连贯性方面的差距。在这项工作中,我们介绍SNaC,一个叙事连贯性评价框架植根于细粒度的注释长摘要。我们开发了一个分类法的连贯性错误生成的叙述性摘要,并收集跨度级注释6.6k句子在150本书和电影剧本摘要。我们的工作提供了第一个表征的连贯性错误所产生的国家的最先进的摘要模型和协议,用于引起一致性判断人群注释。此外,我们发现,收集的注释,使我们能够训练一个强大的分类自动本地化的连贯性错误生成的摘要,以及基准过去的工作在连贯性建模。最后,我们的SNaC框架可以支持长文档摘要和一致性评估的未来工作,包括改进的摘要建模和事后摘要校正。

英文摘要:

Progress in summarizing long texts is inhibited by the lack of appropriate evaluation frameworks. When a long summary must be produced to appropriately cover the facets of that text, that summary needs to present a coherent narrative to be understandable by a reader, but current automatic and human evaluation methods fail to identify gaps in coherence. In this work, we introduce SNaC, a narrative coherence evaluation framework rooted in fine-grained annotations for long summaries. We develop a taxonomy of coherence errors in generated narrative summaries and collect span-level annotations for 6.6k sentences across 150 book and movie screenplay summaries. Our work provides the first characterization of coherence errors generated by state-of-the-art summarization models and a protocol for eliciting coherence judgments from crowd annotators. Furthermore, we show that the collected annotations allow us to train a strong classifier for automatically localizing coherence errors in generated summaries as well as benchmarking past work in coherence modeling. Finally, our SNaC framework can support future work in long document summarization and coherence evaluation, including improved summarization modeling and post-hoc summary correction.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑