arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2205.04641cs.LGcs.ITmath.IT

论域适应与半监督学习中的因果性:参数模型的信息论分析

On Causality in Domain Adaptation and Semi-Supervised Learning: an Information-Theoretic Analysis for Parametric Models

University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学)

Xuetong Wu, Mingming Gong, Jonathan H. Manton, Uwe Aickelin, Jingge Zhu

AI总结:

该研究从信息论视角分析参数模型下因果性对UDA和SSL泛化性能的影响,区分因果与反因果学习场景,推导了不同场景下超额风险与样本量的阶数关系,揭示了因果机制与学习难度的关联。

摘要:

无监督域适应(UDA)和半监督学习(SSL)的最新进展,尤其是结合因果性的研究,已推动这些学习问题在方法上取得显著改进。然而,目前仍缺乏一套正式理论来解释因果性在UDA/SSL泛化性能中的作用。本文针对参数概率模型,在不同因果设定下,研究了可获取m个有标记源数据和n个无标记目标数据作为训练样本的UDA/SSL场景。我们从信息论视角研究了目标域预测的学习性能(如 excess risk,即超额风险)。具体而言,我们区分了两种场景:若特征是原因、标签是结果,则该学习问题称为因果学习;反之则称为反因果学习。我们证明,在因果学习中,仅当源域和目标域的标记分布保持不变时,超额风险与源样本规模的依赖关系为O(1/m)阶。在反因果学习中,无标记数据主导性能,速率通常为O(1/n)阶。这些结果揭示了不同因果机制下,数据样本量与学习问题难度之间的关系。

英文摘要:

Recent advancements in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) and semi-supervised learning (SSL), particularly incorporating causality, have led to significant methodological improvements in these learning problems. However, a formal theory that explains the role of causality in the generalization performance of UDA/SSL is still lacking. In this paper, we consider the UDA/SSL scenarios where we access $m$ labelled source data and $n$ unlabelled target data as training instances under different causal settings with a parametric probabilistic model. We study the learning performance (e.g., excess risk) of prediction in the target domain from an information-theoretic perspective. Specifically, we distinguish two scenarios: the learning problem is called causal learning if the feature is the cause and the label is the effect, and is called anti-causal learning otherwise. We show that in causal learning, the excess risk depends on the size of the source sample at a rate of $O(\frac{1}{m})$ only if the labelling distribution between the source and target domains remains unchanged. In anti-causal learning, we show that the unlabelled data dominate the performance at a rate of typically $O(\frac{1}{n})$. These results bring out the relationship between the data sample size and the hardness of the learning problem with different causal mechanisms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑