arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2204.03742eess.IVcs.CVphysics.med-phq-bio.QM

Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge

Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt(因戈尔施塔特应用技术大学);UMC Utrecht(乌得勒支大学医学中心);Freie Universität Berlin(柏林自由大学);Radboud UMC Nijmegen(奈梅亨拉德堡德大学医学中心);Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg(埃尔朗根-纽伦堡弗里德里希-亚历山大大学);Schwarzman Animal Medical Center(施瓦茨曼动物医学中心);University of Leeds(利兹大学);Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(韩国科学技术院)
Marc Aubreville, Nikolas Stathonikos, Christof A. Bertram, Robert Klopleisch, Natalie ter Hoeve, Francesco Ciompi, Frauke Wilm, Christian Marzahl, Taryn A. Dono… 展开作者

Marc Aubreville, Nikolas Stathonikos, Christof A. Bertram, Robert Klopleisch, Natalie ter Hoeve, Francesco Ciompi, Frauke Wilm, Christian Marzahl, Taryn A. Donovan, Andreas Maier, Jack Breen, Nishant Ravikumar, Youjin Chung, Jinah Park, Ramin Nateghi, Fattaneh Pourakpour, Rutger H. J. Fick, Saima Ben Hadj, Mostafa Jahanifar, Nasir Rajpoot, Jakob Dexl, Thomas Wittenberg, Satoshi Kondo, Maxime W. Lafarge, Viktor H. Koelzer, Jingtang Liang, Yubo Wang, Xi Long, Jingxin Liu, Salar Razavi, April Khademi, Sen Yang, Xiyue Wang, Mitko Veta, Katharina Breininger

英文摘要:

The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment than was used for training. One decisive component in the underlying domain shift has been identified as the variability caused by using different whole slide scanners. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge has been to propose and evaluate methods that counter this domain shift and derive scanner-agnostic mitosis detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As a test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were given. The best approaches performed on an expert level, with the winning algorithm yielding an F_1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781). In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑