arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2204.02406eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV

A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust(莫菲尔德眼科医院NHS基金会信托);University College London(伦敦大学学院);University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学);University of Cologne(科隆大学);Goethe University(歌德大学);Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学阿姆斯特丹医学中心);Radboudumc(拉德堡德大学医学中心);University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Centre for Eye Research Australia(澳大利亚眼科研究中心);Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital(皇家维多利亚眼耳医院);The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学);National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of Health (NIH)(美国国立卫生研究院国家眼科研究所)
Roy Schwartz, Hagar Khalid, Sandra Liakopoulos, Yanling Ouyang, Coen de Vente, Cristina González-Gonzalo, Aaron Y. Lee, Robyn Guymer, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine E… 展开作者

Roy Schwartz, Hagar Khalid, Sandra Liakopoulos, Yanling Ouyang, Coen de Vente, Cristina González-Gonzalo, Aaron Y. Lee, Robyn Guymer, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine Egan, Zhichao Wu, Himeesh Kumar, Joseph Farrington, Clara I. Sánchez, Adnan Tufail

英文摘要:

Purpose - To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) on optical coherence tomography scans. Design - Development and validation of deep learning models for classification and feature segmentation. Methods - A DL framework was developed consisting of a classification model and an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection model for the identification of ungradable scans; a classification model to identify scans with drusen or RPD; and an image segmentation model to independently segment lesions as RPD or drusen. Data were obtained from 1284 participants in the UK Biobank (UKBB) with a self-reported diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and 250 UKBB controls. Drusen and RPD were manually delineated by five retina specialists. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), kappa, accuracy and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results - The classification models performed strongly at their respective tasks (0.95, 0.93, and 0.99 AUC, respectively, for the ungradable scans classifier, the OOD model, and the drusen and RPD classification model). The mean ICC for drusen and RPD area vs. graders was 0.74 and 0.61, respectively, compared with 0.69 and 0.68 for intergrader agreement. FROC curves showed that the model's sensitivity was close to human performance. Conclusions - The models achieved high classification and segmentation performance, similar to human performance. Application of this robust framework will further our understanding of RPD as a separate entity from drusen in both research and clinical settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑