arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.16263cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS

语音深度伪造检测是否具有泛化能力?

Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?

Fraunhofer AISEC(弗劳恩霍夫AISEC研究所);Technical University Munich(慕尼黑工业大学);why do birds GmbH

Nicolas M. Müller, Pavel Czempin, Franziska Dieckmann, Adam Froghyar, Konstantin Böttinger

AI总结:

本文系统化评估了语音伪造检测方法,发现使用cqtspec或logspec特征可提升性能37%,并揭示现有方法在现实数据上表现不佳,可能因过度依赖ASVSpoof基准而无法有效检测真实世界中的深度伪造。

摘要:

当前文本到语音算法能生成逼真的人类声音伪造,因此深度伪造检测成为亟需研究的领域。尽管研究人员提出了多种检测语音伪造的技术,但其成功原因往往不明确:预处理步骤、超参数设置和微调程度在相关工作中不一致。本文针对这一问题:我们通过重新实现和统一评估相关工作中的架构,系统化语音伪造检测。我们识别出成功的语音深度伪造检测的总体特征,例如使用cqtspec或logspec特征而不是melspec特征,这在其他因素不变的情况下,平均将性能提高37% EER。此外,我们评估了泛化能力:我们收集并发布了包含37.9小时发现的名人和政治家音频录音的新数据集,其中17.2小时为深度伪造。我们发现相关工作在这样的现实数据上表现不佳(性能下降高达100%)。这可能表明社区的解决方案过于紧密地依赖于现有的ASVSpoof基准,且深度伪造在实验室之外的检测难度可能比之前认为的要大得多。

英文摘要:

Current text-to-speech algorithms produce realistic fakes of human voices, making deepfake detection a much-needed area of research. While researchers have presented various techniques for detecting audio spoofs, it is often unclear exactly why these architectures are successful: Preprocessing steps, hyperparameter settings, and the degree of fine-tuning are not consistent across related work. Which factors contribute to success, and which are accidental? In this work, we address this problem: We systematize audio spoofing detection by re-implementing and uniformly evaluating architectures from related work. We identify overarching features for successful audio deepfake detection, such as using cqtspec or logspec features instead of melspec features, which improves performance by 37% EER on average, all other factors constant. Additionally, we evaluate generalization capabilities: We collect and publish a new dataset consisting of 37.9 hours of found audio recordings of celebrities and politicians, of which 17.2 hours are deepfakes. We find that related work performs poorly on such real-world data (performance degradation of up to one thousand percent). This may suggest that the community has tailored its solutions too closely to the prevailing ASVSpoof benchmark and that deepfakes are much harder to detect outside the lab than previously thought.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑