arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.12342cs.HC
收藏

信息系统中不同概念建模方法的认知冲突

Cognitive Workload Associated with Different Conceptual Modeling Approaches in Information Systems

Andreas Knoben, Maryam Alimardani, Arash Saghafi, Amin K. Amiri

摘要:

概念模型直观地表示信息系统中的实体及其之间的关系。有效的概念模型应该简单,同时传达足够的信息。这种模型复杂性和清晰性之间的权衡对于防止信息系统开发失败至关重要。过去的研究发现,更具表达力的模型在测量用户对模型的深入理解的任务上会导致更高的性能,并将其归因于与这些模型相关的认知工作量体验较低。本研究通过测量用户在完成具有不同概念模型的任务时的EEG大脑活动来验证这一假设。30名参与者被分为两组:一组使用低本体表达模型(LOEM),另一组使用高本体表达模型(HOEM)。任务期间的认知工作负荷使用EEG参与指数进行量化,EEG参与指数是β中的大脑活动功率与α和θ频带之和的比率。LOEM和HOEM组之间的认知工作量没有显着差异,表明理解两种模型所需的认知处理量相同。本研究的主要贡献是引入神经生理学测量作为概念建模和信息系统领域认知工作负荷的客观量化。

英文摘要:

Conceptual models visually represent entities and relationships between them in an information system. Effective conceptual models should be simple while communicating sufficient information. This trade-off between model complexity and clarity is crucial to prevent failure of information system development. Past studies have found that more expressive models lead to higher performance on tasks measuring a user s deep understanding of the model and attributed this to lower experience of cognitive workload associated with these models. This study examined this hypothesis by measuring users EEG brain activity while they completed a task with different conceptual models. 30 participants were divided into two groups: One group used a low ontologically expressive model (LOEM), and the other group used a high ontologically expressive model (HOEM). Cognitive workload during the task was quantified using EEG Engagement Index, which is a ratio of brain activity power in beta as opposed to the sum of alpha and theta frequency bands. No significant difference in cognitive workload was found between the LOEM and HOEM groups indicating equal amounts of cognitive processing required for understanding of both models. The main contribution of this study is the introduction of neurophysiological measures as an objective quantification of cognitive workload in the field of conceptual modeling and information systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑