arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.07030cs.CYcs.HC
收藏

实践中的数字孪生:来自民族志行动研究的新兴见解

Digital Twin in Practice: Emergent Insights from an ethnographic-action research study

Ashwin Agrawal, Vishal Singh, Robert Thiel, Michael Pillsbury, Harrison Knoll, Jay Puckett, Martin Fischer

摘要:

基于一个民族志行动研究的数字孪生(DT)部署在自动化公路养护项目,本文报告了一些绊脚石,从业者面临的同时部署DT在实践中。一开始,案例研究的范围是从数字化、软件开发和部署的角度广泛定义的,后来在项目参与者之间的集体反思会议上转向了数字孪生的概念。通过各种项目利益相关者之间的讨论,通过迭代学习周期,案例研究揭示了建筑,工程和施工(AEC)从业人员在实践中面临的障碍。这项研究发现,从业人员在以下方面面临困难:(1)由于对数字孪生概念缺乏共识而形成共同的理解,(2)由于无法详尽地评估和选择数字孪生中的适当能力而适应和投资于数字孪生,及(3)由于无法评估数字化转型对组织状况及流程的影响,未能为数字孪生发展分配资源。

英文摘要:

Based on an ethnographic action research study for a Digital Twin (DT) deployment on an automated highway maintenance project, this paper reports some of the stumbling blocks that practitioners face while deploying a DT in practice. At the outset, the scope of the case study was broadly defined in terms of digitalization, and software development and deployment, which later pivoted towards the concept of Digital Twin during the collective reflection sessions between the project participants. Through an iterative learning cycle via discussions among the various project stakeholders, the case study led to uncovering the roadblocks in practice faced by the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) practitioners. This research finds that the practitioners are facing difficulty in: (1) Creating a shared understanding due to the lack of consensus on the Digital Twin concept, (2) Adapting and investing in Digital Twin due to inability to exhaustively evaluate and select the appropriate capabilities in a Digital Twin, and (3) Allocation of resources for Digital Twin development due to the inability to assess the impact of DT on the organizational conditions and processes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑