arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.03802cs.CLcs.HC
收藏

从人工文本理解迭代修改

Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Text

University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学);Grammarly(Grammarly公司);Univ. Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);University of Minnesota(明尼苏达大学)

Wanyu Du, Vipul Raheja, Dhruv Kumar, Zae Myung Kim, Melissa Lopez, Dongyeop Kang

摘要:

从本质上讲,写作是一个战略性的、适应性的过程,更重要的是,它是一个反复的过程。写作的一个关键部分是编辑和修改文本。以前的文本修订工作主要集中在定义一个单一的域内的编辑意图分类或开发计算模型与一个单一的编辑粒度级别,如重复级别的编辑,这不同于人类的修订周期。这项工作描述了IteraTeR:第一个大规模,多领域,编辑意图注释语料库的迭代修订文本。特别是,IteraTeR收集的基础上,一个新的框架,全面建模的迭代文本修订,推广到正式写作,编辑意图,修订深度和粒度的各个领域。当我们结合我们的注释编辑意图时,生成和基于编辑的文本修订模型都显着提高了自动评估。通过我们的工作,我们更好地理解了文本修订过程,在编辑意图和写作质量之间建立了重要的联系,从而能够创建不同的语料库,以支持迭代文本修订的计算建模。

英文摘要:

Writing is, by nature, a strategic, adaptive, and more importantly, an iterative process. A crucial part of writing is editing and revising the text. Previous works on text revision have focused on defining edit intention taxonomies within a single domain or developing computational models with a single level of edit granularity, such as sentence-level edits, which differ from human's revision cycles. This work describes IteraTeR: the first large-scale, multi-domain, edit-intention annotated corpus of iteratively revised text. In particular, IteraTeR is collected based on a new framework to comprehensively model the iterative text revisions that generalize to various domains of formal writing, edit intentions, revision depths, and granularities. When we incorporate our annotated edit intentions, both generative and edit-based text revision models significantly improve automatic evaluations. Through our work, we better understand the text revision process, making vital connections between edit intentions and writing quality, enabling the creation of diverse corpora to support computational modeling of iterative text revisions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑