Our approach to Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis is designed to increase reproducibility of causal effect "discoveries" by: (i) using a Bayesian approach to inference; (ii) replacing the point null hypothesis with a region of practical equivalence consisting of values of negligible magnitude for the effect of interest, while exploiting the ability of Bayesian analysis to quantify the evidence of the effect falling inside/outside the region; (iii) rejecting the usual binary decision logic in favour of a ternary logic where the hypothesis test may result in either an acceptance or a rejection of the null, while also accommodating an "uncertain" outcome. We present an approach to calibration of the proposed method via loss function, which we use to compare our approach with a frequentist one. We illustrate the method with the aid of a study of the causal effect of obesity on risk of juvenile myocardial infarction.
Multivariable Mendelian randomization with weak instruments: a comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney（悉尼大学公共卫生学院）；MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge（剑桥大学医学研究委员会生物统计单元）；Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge（剑桥大学心血管流行病学单元）
Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a popular method in epidemiology and genetics that uses genetic variation as instrumental variables for causal inference. Existing MR methods usually assume most genetic variants are valid instrumental variables that identify a common causal effect. There is a general lack of awareness that this effect homogeneity assumption can be violated when there are multiple causal pathways involved, even if all the instrumental variables are valid. In this article, we introduce a latent mixture model MR-PATH that groups instruments that yield similar causal effect estimat…
The use of genetic variants as instrumental variables - an approach known as Mendelian randomization - is a popular epidemiological method for estimating the causal effect of an exposure (phenotype, biomarker, risk factor) on a disease or health-related outcome from observational data. Instrumental variables must satisfy strong, often untestable assumptions, which means that finding good genetic instruments among a large list of potential candidates is challenging. This difficulty is compounded by the fact that many genetic variants influence more than one phenotype through different causal pa…
Background: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a useful approach to causal inference from observational studies when randomised controlled trials are not feasible. However, study heterogeneity of two association studies required in MR is often overlooked. When dealing with large studies, recently developed Bayesian MR is limited by its computational expensiveness. Methods: We addressed study heterogeneity by proposing a random effect Bayesian MR model with multiple exposures and outcomes. For large studies, we adopted a subset posterior aggregation method to tackle the problem of computation. In …
We expand Mendelian Randomization (MR) methodology to deal with randomly missing data on either the exposure or the outcome variable, and furthermore with data from nonindependent individuals (eg components of a family). Our method rests on the Bayesian MR framework proposed by Berzuini et al (2018), which we apply in a study of multiplex Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Sardinian families to characterise the role of certain plasma proteins in MS causation. The method is robust to presence of pleiotropic effects in an unknown number of instruments, and is able to incorporate inter-individual kinship in…
Our Bayesian approach to Mendelian Randomisation uses multiple instruments to assess the putative causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. The approach is robust to violations of the (untestable) Exclusion Restriction condition, and hence it does not require instruments to be independent of the outcome conditional on the exposure and on the confounders of the exposure-outcome relationship. The Bayesian approach offers a rigorous handling of the uncertainty (e.g. about the estimated instrument-exposure associations), freedom from asymptotic approximations of the null distribution and the pos…
Background In a study performed on multiplex Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Sardinian families to identify disease causing plasma proteins, application of Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods encounters difficulties due to relatedness of individuals, correlation between finely mapped genotype instrumental variables (IVs) and presence of missing exposures. Method We specialize the method of Berzuini et al (2018) to deal with these difficulties. The proposed method allows pedigree structure to enter the specification of the outcome distribution via kinship matrix, and treating missing exposures as addi…
Estimating the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome is an important task in many economical and biological studies. Mendelian randomization, in particular, uses genetic variants as instruments to estimate causal effects in epidemiological studies. However, conventional instrumental variable methods rely on some untestable assumptions, which may be violated in real problems. In this paper, we adopt a Bayesian framework and build hierarchical models to incorporate invalid effects of instruments. We introduce an empirical Bayes estimator for which some of the instruments are invalid by util…
Valid estimation of a causal effect using instrumental variables requires that all of the instruments are independent of the outcome conditional on the risk factor of interest and any confounders. In Mendelian randomization studies with large numbers of genetic variants used as instruments, it is unlikely that this condition will be met. Any given genetic variant could be associated with a large number of traits, all of which represent potential pathways to the outcome which bypass the risk factor of interest. Such pleiotropy can be accounted for using standard multivariable Mendelian randomiz…
Mendelian randomization (MR) has been a popular method in genetic epidemiology to estimate the effect of an exposure on an outcome using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IV), with two-sample summary-data MR being the most popular. Unfortunately, instruments in MR studies are often weakly associated with the exposure, which can bias effect estimates and inflate Type I errors. In this work, we propose test statistics that are robust under weak instrument asymptotics by extending the Anderson-Rubin, Kleibergen, and the conditional likelihood ratio test in econometrics to two-sample sum…
Multivariable Mendelian randomization estimates the causal effect of multiple exposures on an outcome, typically using summary statistics of genetic variant associations. However, exposures of interest in Mendelian randomization applications will often be measured with error. The summary statistics will therefore not be of the genetic associations with the exposure, but with the exposure measured with error. Classical measurement error will not bias genetic association estimates but will increase their standard errors. With a single exposure, this will result in bias toward the null in a two s…
When genetic variants in a gene cluster are associated with a disease outcome, the causal pathway from the variants to the outcome can be difficult to disentangle. For example, the chemokine receptor gene cluster contains genetic variants associated with various cytokines. Associations between variants in this cluster and stroke risk may be driven by any of these cytokines. Multivariable Mendelian randomization is an extension of standard univariable Mendelian randomization to estimate the direct effects of related exposures with shared genetic predictors. However, when genetic variants are cl…
Methods have been developed for Mendelian randomization that can obtain consistent causal estimates while relaxing the instrumental variable assumptions. These include multivariable Mendelian randomization, in which a genetic variant may be associated with multiple risk factors so long as any association with the outcome is via the measured risk factors (measured pleiotropy), and the MR-Egger (Mendelian randomization-Egger) method, in which a genetic variant may be directly associated with the outcome not via the risk factor of interest, so long as the direct effects of the variants on the out…
Instrumental variables have been widely used for estimating the causal effect between exposure and outcome. Conventional estimation methods require complete knowledge about all the instruments' validity; a valid instrument must not have a direct effect on the outcome and not be related to unmeasured confounders. Often, this is impractical as highlighted by Mendelian randomization studies where genetic markers are used as instruments and complete knowledge about instruments' validity is equivalent to complete knowledge about the involved genes' functions. In this paper, we propose a method for …
The results from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) on thousands of phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to infer the causal effect of one phenotype (exposure) on another (outcome). Mendelian randomization (MR), an instrumental variable (IV) method, has been introduced for causal inference using GWAS data. Due to the polygenic architecture of complex traits/diseases and the ubiquity of pleiotropy, however, MR has many unique challenges compared to conventional IV methods. We propose a Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization (BWMR) for causal inference to address these challeng…
Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular approach to study the effect of a modifiable exposure on an outcome by using genetic variants as instrumental variables. A challenge in MR is that each genetic variant explains a relatively small proportion of variance in the exposure and there are many such variants, a setting known as many weak instruments. To this end, we provide a theoretical characterization of the statistical properties of two popular estimators in MR, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator and the IVW estimator with screened instruments using an independent select…
Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to make causal inferences from observational data. The field is currently undergoing a revolution fuelled by increasing numbers of genetic variants demonstrated to be associated with exposures in genome-wide association studies, and the public availability of summarized data on genetic associations with exposures and outcomes from large consortia. A Mendelian randomization analysis with many genetic variants can be performed relatively simply using summarized data. However, a causal interpretation is only assured if each genetic variant sa…
Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants to make causal inferences about a modifiable exposure. Subject to a genetic variant satisfying the instrumental variable assumptions, an association between the variant and outcome implies a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome. Complications arise with a binary exposure that is a dichotomization of a continuous risk factor (for example, hypertension is a dichotomization of blood pressure). This can lead to violation of the exclusion restriction assumption: the genetic variant can influence the outcome via the continuous risk factor even if…
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a statistical method exploiting genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of modifiable risk factors on an outcome of interest. Despite wide uses of various popular two-sample MR methods based on genome-wide association study summary level data, however, those methods could suffer from potential power loss or/and biased inference when the chosen genetic variants are in linkage disequilibrium (LD), and also have relatively large direct effects on the outcome whose distribution might be heavy-tailed which is commonly referred to as t…
Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for inferring the presence, or otherwise, of causal effects from observational data. However, the nature of genetic variants is such that pleiotropy remains a barrier to valid causal effect estimation. There are many options in the literature for pleiotropy robust methods when studying the effects of a single risk factor on an outcome. However, there are few pleiotropy robust methods in the multivariable setting, that is, when there are multiple risk factors of interest. In this paper we introduce three methods which build on common approaches in the …
Standard Mendelian randomization analysis can produce biased results if the genetic variant defining the instrumental variable (IV) is confounded and/or has a horizontal pleiotropic effect on the outcome of interest not mediated by the treatment. We provide novel identification conditions for the causal effect of a treatment in presence of unmeasured confounding, by leveraging an invalid IV for which both the IV independence and exclusion restriction assumptions may be violated. The proposed Mendelian Randomization Mixed-Scale Treatment Effect Robust Identification (MR MiSTERI) approach relies…
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular instrumental variable (IV) approach, in which one or several genetic markers serve as IVs that can sometimes be leveraged to recover valid inferences about a given exposure-outcome causal association subject to unmeasured confounding. A key IV identification condition known as the exclusion restriction states that the IV cannot have a direct effect on the outcome which is not mediated by the exposure in view. In MR studies, such an assumption requires an unrealistic level of prior knowledge about the mechanism by which genetic markers causally affect t…
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful approach to examine the causal relationships between health risk factors and outcomes from observational studies. Due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and abundant fully accessible GWASs summary statistics, a variety of two-sample MR methods for summary data have been developed to either detect or account for horizontal pleiotropy, primarily based on the assumption that the effects of variants on exposure (γ) and horizontal pleiotropy (α) are independent. This assumption is too strict and can be easily violated because o…
Improving Mendelian Randomization Analysis by Instrument Borrowing from Auxiliary Outcome Traits
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health（约翰斯·霍普金斯彭博公共卫生学院生物统计系）；Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University（约翰斯·霍普金斯大学医学院肿瘤系）
Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants to make causal inferences about the effect of a risk factor on an outcome. With fine-mapped genetic data, there may be hundreds of genetic variants in a single gene region any of which could be used to assess this causal relationship. However, using too many genetic variants in the analysis can lead to spurious estimates and inflated Type 1 error rates. But if only a few genetic variants are used, then the majority of the data is ignored and estimates are highly sensitive to the particular choice of variants. We propose an approach based on summari…
Correction for Weak IV Bias and Winner's Curse in Mendelian Randomization Egger Regression: Rerandomized Egger estimator
Huazhong University of Science and Technology（华中科技大学）；Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology（华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院）
Simultaneously accounting for the winner's curse and sample structure in Mendelian randomization: bivariate rerandomized inverse variance weighted estimator
Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology（华中科技大学同济医学院）；Guangzhou Medical University（广州医科大学）；Guangzhou First People’s Hospital（广州市第一人民医院）
Towards more plausible point-identifying assumptions in two-sample Mendelian randomization
Federal University of Pelotas（佩洛塔斯联邦大学）；University of Bristol（布里斯托大学）；University College London（伦敦大学学院）；Norwegian University of Science and Technology（挪威科技大学）
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular method in genetic epidemiology to estimate the effect of an exposure on an outcome by using genetic instruments. These instruments are often selected from a combination of prior knowledge from genome wide association studies (GWAS) and data-driven instrument selection procedures or tests. Unfortunately, when testing for the exposure effect, the instrument selection process done a priori is not accounted for. This paper studies and highlights the bias resulting from not accounting for the instrument selection process by focusing on a recent data-driven …
Developments in genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of summary genetic association data have made the application of two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) with summary data increasingly popular. Conventional two-sample MR methods often employ the same sample for selecting relevant genetic variants and for constructing final causal estimates. Such a practice often leads to biased causal effect estimates due to the well known "winner's curse" phenomenon. To address this fundamental challenge, we first examine its consequence on causal effect estimation both theoreti…
