arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.02192cs.AIcs.IR
收藏

Optimal Keywords Grouping in Sponsored Search Advertising under Uncertain Environments

Huazhong University of Science and Technology(华中科技大学)

Huiran Li, Yanwu Yang

英文摘要:

In sponsored search advertising, advertisers need to make a series of keyword decisions. Among them, how to group these keywords to form several adgroups within a campaign is a challenging task, due to the highly uncertain environment of search advertising. This paper proposes a stochastic programming model for keywords grouping, taking click-through rate and conversion rate as random variables, with consideration of budget constraints and advertisers' risk-tolerance. A branch-and-bound algorithm is developed to solve our model. Furthermore, we conduct computational experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our model and solution, with two real-world datasets collected from reports and logs of search advertising campaigns. Experimental results illustrated that our keywords grouping approach outperforms five baselines, and it can approximately approach the optimum in a steady way. This research generates several interesting findings that illuminate critical managerial insights for advertisers in sponsored search advertising. First, keywords grouping does matter for advertisers, especially in the situation with a large number of keywords. Second, in keyword grouping decisions, the marginal profit does not necessarily show the marginal diminishing phenomenon as the budget increases. Such that, it's a worthy try for advertisers to increase their budget in keywords grouping decisions, in order to obtain additional profit. Third, the optimal keywords grouping solution is a result of multifaceted trade-off among various advertising factors. In particular, assigning more keywords into adgroups or having more budget won't certainly lead to higher profits. This suggests a warning for advertisers that it's not wise to take the number of keywords as the criterion for keywords grouping decisions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑