arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.01781stat.AP
收藏

基于估计量框架的肿瘤学中事件发生时间估计量与失访问题

Time-to-event estimands and loss to follow-up in oncology in light of the estimands framework

Jonathan Siegel, Hans-Jochen Weber, Stefan Englert, Feng Liu

AI总结:

本研究围绕肿瘤学临床试验中的事件发生时间估计量,结合ICH E9估计量框架,探讨了存在并发事件时失访影响研究结果的实际问题,给出试验设计建议,并提出可通过敏感性与补充分析检验假设。

摘要:

事件发生时间(time-to-event)估计量是众多肿瘤学临床试验的核心。估计量框架(ICH E9指南的补充文件)要求精确定义目标治疗效应以匹配目标临床问题,并且需要预先设定对治疗启动后发生的并发事件的处理方式——这类事件要么会阻碍对目标事件的观测,要么会影响治疗效应的解读。我们探讨了临床试验设计与执行中的一个实际问题:即在某些临床情境下,无法系统地对患者进行随访直至目标事件发生。存在并发事件时的失访情况,会影响研究结果的含义与解读。我们针对试验设计给出了建议,强调需使目标临床问题与研究设计紧密契合,并关注其对数据收集的影响及其他实际意义。当无法对患者进行系统随访时,可能需要做出权衡,以选择在现有条件下可被可行估计的最优可用估计量。我们还探讨了利用敏感性分析与补充分析来检验相关假设的方法。

英文摘要:

Time-to-event estimands are central to many oncology clinical trials. The estimand framework (addendum to the ICH E9 guideline) calls for precisely defining the treatment effect of interest to align with the clinical question of interest and requires predefining the handling of intercurrent events that occur after treatment initiation and either preclude the observation of an event of interest or impact the interpretation of the treatment effect. We discuss a practical problem in clinical trial design and execution, i.e. in some clinical contexts it is not feasible to systematically follow patients to an event of interest. Loss to follow-up in the presence of intercurrent events can affect the meaning and interpretation of the study results. We provide recommendations for trial design, stressing the need for close alignment of the clinical question of interest and study design, impact on data collection and other practical implications. When patients cannot be systematically followed, compromise may be necessary to select the best available estimand that can be feasibly estimated under the circumstances. We discuss the use of sensitivity and supplementary analyses to examine assumptions of interest.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑